Medical Humanities

835 papers and 6.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 835 papers published in Medical Humanities in the last decades have received a total of 6.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Medical Humanities usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (309 papers), General Health Professions (166 papers) and Clinical Psychology (155 papers) specifically the topics of Empathy and Medical Education (283 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (109 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Humanities are Jane Macnaughton, Abigail Woods, Kenneth Boyd, Angela Woods, Larry Davidson, David Roe, Johanna Shapiro, Joan McCarthy, Virgínia Berridge and Luna Dolezal.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medical Humanities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Humanities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Humanities.

Countries where authors publish in Medical Humanities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Humanities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Humanities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Humanities more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025