Xiao-Ling Liao

14 papers receiving 266 citations

Xiao-Ling Liao's Hit Papers

Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Chinese Depression Anxiety Stress Scale for Youth (DASS-Y) and DASS-21 2023 · 55 citations
550+1+2Years since publication1020304050

Peers

Xiao-Ling Liao
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Leadership and Management 9
  • Applied Psychology 24
  • Clinical Psychology 87
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 41
  • Social Psychology 52
Replace John B. Waits with:
John B. Waits United States
Isabel A. Thompson United States
Fatma Özlem Öztürk Türkiye
Yang Eun Kim South Korea
Jacqueline Hogue Canada
Andrea Fontana Italy
Vered Shenaar‐Golan Israel
Lisa Farinelli United States
Reza Dastjerdi Iran
Xiao-Ling Liao relative to John B. Waits United States John B. Waits's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
John B. Waits · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiao-Ling Liao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiao-Ling Liao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiao-Ling Liao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiao-Ling Liao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiao-Ling Liao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiao-Ling Liao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiao-Ling Liao. The network helps show where Xiao-Ling Liao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Xiao-Ling Liao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiao-Ling Liao Line = papers co-authored together Xiao-Ling Liao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202373
2 202361
3
Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Chinese Depression Anxiety Stress Scale for Youth (DASS-Y) and DASS-21
Hit paper breakdown →
202355
4 202124
5 202314
6 202213
7 20248
8 20236
9 20246
10 20254
11 20253
12 20242
13 20251
14 20261
15 20240
16 20250

About Xiao-Ling Liao

Xiao-Ling Liao is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Leadership and Management (9 citations), Applied Psychology (24 citations), Clinical Psychology (87 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (41 citations) and Social Psychology (52 citations). Xiao-Ling Liao has collaborated with scholars based in China, Taiwan and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include I‐Hua Chen, Chung‐Ying Lin, Mark D. Griffiths, Jeffrey Hugh Gamble, Xudong Li, Chao‐Ying Chen, Yu‐Cheng Tsai, Amir H. Pakpour, Xudong Li and Lingling Li. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychologica, BMC Psychology, Frontiers in Public Health, Psychology Research and Behavior Management and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact