Richard Rende

59 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Richard Rende
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Clinical Psychology 1.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 782
  • Applied Psychology 164
  • Health 240
  • Speech and Hearing 173
Replace Meyer D. Glantz with:
Meyer D. Glantz United States
Shannon E. Daley United States
Theodore Jacob United States
Maria M. Wong United States
Nathaniel R. Riggs United States
Lauren S. Wakschlag United States
Catherine Ramsay Roberts United States
David S. Bennett United States
José A. Piqueras Spain
Robert T. Ammerman United States
Richard Rende relative to Meyer D. Glantz United States Meyer D. Glantz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Meyer D. Glantz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Rende

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Rende's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Rende with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Rende more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Rende

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Rende. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Rende. The network helps show where Richard Rende may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Rende, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Rende Line = papers co-authored together Richard Rende links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009293
2 1995248
3 2001215
4 2008200
5 2014121
6 1994119
7 2005112
8 200798
9 199398
10 199796
11
Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology (Vol.2): Internalizing and externalizing expressions of dysfunction
199188
12 200583
13 200874
14 199373
15 198870
16 199268
17 199263
18 200857
19 198955
20 200750

About Richard Rende

Richard Rende is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, Physiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (35 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (17 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (10 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (9 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.5k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (782 citations), Applied Psychology (164 citations), Health (240 citations) and Speech and Hearing (173 citations). Richard Rende has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert Plomin, Cheryl Slomkowski, Raymond Niaura, Elizabeth E. Lloyd‐Richardson, Stephen E. Gilman, Craig Edelbrock, Lee Anne Thompson, Brian Hitsman, Rand D. Conger and Katherine J. Conger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychology, Addiction, PEDIATRICS and Development and Psychopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact