George Luta

147 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

George Luta
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Rheumatology 592
  • Computational Mathematics 24
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 82
  • Oncology 510
  • Genetics 481
Replace Wei‐Qi Wei with:
Wei‐Qi Wei United States
Chuen Seng Tan Singapore
Vivian S. Gainer United States
Sheng Luo United States
Brent R. Logan United States
Peter Richardson United States
Susan A. Oliveria United States
Takuhiro Yamaguchi Japan
Bee Choo Tai Singapore
Amylou C. Dueck United States
George Luta relative to Wei‐Qi Wei United States Wei‐Qi Wei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
Wei‐Qi Wei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Luta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Luta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Luta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Luta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Luta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Luta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Luta. The network helps show where George Luta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Luta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Luta Line = papers co-authored together George Luta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 159 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010253
2 1999212
3 2014202
4 2017147
5 2014124
6 2014122
7
Knee pain and knee osteoarthritis severity in self-reported task specific disability: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.
1997117
8 201793
9 201485
10 200579
11 201072
12 201470
13 201670
14 201265
15 201764
16 201360
17 201258
18 201457
19 201155
20 201453

About George Luta

George Luta is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, General Health Professions and Physiology, having authored 159 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (13 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (13 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (13 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (11 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (11 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (8 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (7 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (592 citations), Computational Mathematics (24 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (82 citations), Oncology (510 citations) and Genetics (481 citations). George Luta has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Anca Dragomir, Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Joanne M. Jordan, Jordan B. Renner, Claudine Isaacs, Kathryn L. Taylor, Raymond Niaura, Virginia B. Kraus, Darren Mays and Marc D. Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact