Replace Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology with:
Journal of Abnormal Child PsychologyUnited States
Psychological AssessmentUnited States
Clinical Psychology ReviewUnited States
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent PsychologyUnited States
Journal of Youth and AdolescenceUnited States
Journal of Counseling PsychologyUnited States
Journal of PersonalityUnited States
Journal of Personality AssessmentUnited States
Current Directions in Psychological ScienceUnited States
Journal of AdolescenceUnited States
Journal of Abnormal Child PsychologyUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Development and Psychopathology
Development and Psychopathology · 1×
×1.0137.6kCP
×0.846.3kSP
×1.139.9kEDUCA
×1.540.1kCN
×0.922.5kSPS
Citations per year, relative to Development and Psychopathology
Development and Psychopathology · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Development and Psychopathology
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Development and Psychopathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Development and Psychopathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development and Psychopathology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Development and Psychopathology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Development and Psychopathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Development and Psychopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.