Richard Powers

671 citations
9 papers · 470 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Powers

8 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Richard Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Management Information Systems 223
  • Information Systems and Management 99
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 99
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 95
  • Strategy and Management 122
Replace Evan E. Anderson with:
Evan E. Anderson United States
Paul Hawking Australia
Ming‐Chih Tsai Taiwan
A.R. Venkatachalam United States
Hong-Mei Chen United States
Luc Cassivi Canada
Walter W.C. Chung Hong Kong
Himangshu Paul Thailand
W.G.M.M. Rutten Netherlands
O. Felix Offodile United States
Richard Powers relative to Evan E. Anderson United States Evan E. Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Evan E. Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Powers. The network helps show where Richard Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Richard Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Powers Line = papers co-authored together Richard Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1973198
2 1995168
3 199342
4
OPTIMIZATION MODELS FOR LOGISTICS DECISIONS
198927
5 198018
6
An empirical investigation of selected hypotheses related to the success of management information system projects
19718
7 19836
8
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF EDUCATION.
19672
9 19911

About Richard Powers

Richard Powers is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management and Information Systems, having authored 9 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (2 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (1 paper), Business Strategies and Innovation (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper), ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (1 paper), Smart Grid Energy Management (1 paper), Collaboration in agile enterprises (1 paper) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (223 citations), Information Systems and Management (99 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (99 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (95 citations) and Strategy and Management (122 citations). Richard Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Gary W. Dickson, Arthur M. Geoffrion, Bernard J. La Londe and Alexander M. Mood. Their work appears in journals such as INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics, Journal of Business Logistics, California Management Review, The International Journal of Logistics Management and Marketing Education Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact