Marketing Education Review

886 papers and 8.7k indexed citations

About

The 886 papers published in Marketing Education Review in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Marketing Education Review usually cover Management of Technology and Innovation (722 papers), Education (359 papers) and Accounting (283 papers) specifically the topics of Management and Marketing Education (711 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (271 papers) and Innovations in Educational Methods (177 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Marketing Education Review are Debra A. Laverie, Dennis E. Clayson, Lawrence B. Chonko, Debra A. Haley, O. C. Ferrell, Jana Bowden, James A. Muncy, Diana L. Haytko, Brian A. Vander Schee and Scott R. Swanson.

In The Last Decade

Marketing Education Review

800 papers receiving 7.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Marketing Education Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Marketing Education Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Marketing Education Review.

Countries where authors publish in Marketing Education Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Marketing Education Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Marketing Education Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marketing Education Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026