Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An Analysis Of Vendor Selection Systems And Decisions
Countries citing papers authored by Gary W. Dickson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Gary W. Dickson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gary W. Dickson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gary W. Dickson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gary W. Dickson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gary W. Dickson. The network helps show where Gary W. Dickson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gary W. Dickson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gary W. Dickson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gary W. Dickson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gary W. Dickson. Gary W. Dickson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
DeSanctis, Gerardine, Gary W. Dickson, & Marshall Scott Poole. (1996). The Dynamics of Teams and Technology: A Field Study of Groupware in a Network Organization. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 31.3 indexed citations
Dickson, Gary W., et al.. (1987). Assessment of the information systems organization : an empirical investigation of assessor perspectives. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 34.12 indexed citations
9.
Vogel, Doug, John A. Lehman, & Gary W. Dickson. (1986). THE IMPACT OF GRAPHICAL DISPLAYS ON PERSUASION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 5.9 indexed citations
10.
Gallupe, R. Brent, Gerardine DeSanctis, & Gary W. Dickson. (1986). THE IMPACT OF COMPUTER-BASED SUPPORT ON THE PROCESS AND OUTCOMES OF GROUP DECISION MAKING. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 6.31 indexed citations
Dickson, Gary W. & James C. Wetherbe. (1985). Management of Information Systems Casebook. McGraw-Hill eBooks.2 indexed citations
13.
Dickson, Gary W., et al.. (1985). Understanding the Effectiveness of Computer Graphics for Decision Support: A Cumulative Experimental Approach.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 3.1 indexed citations
14.
Lehman, John A., Doug Vogel, & Gary W. Dickson. (1984). Business graphics trends. Datamation. 30(19). 119–122.7 indexed citations
15.
Järvenpää, Sirkka L., Gary W. Dickson, & Gerardine DeSanctis. (1984). Methodological Issues in Experimental IS Research: Experiences and Recommendations.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 10.3 indexed citations
Carlis, John V., Salvatore T. March, & Gary W. Dickson. (1981). Physical Database Design: A DSS Approach.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 23.1 indexed citations
Dickson, Gary W., Izak Benbasat, & William R. King. (1980). THE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS AREA: PROBLEMS, CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 4.36 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.