Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.
2013369 citationsSaul M. Kassin, Itiel E. Dror et al.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognitionprofile →
Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias
2020162 citationsItiel E. DrorAnalytical Chemistryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Itiel E. Dror's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Itiel E. Dror with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Itiel E. Dror more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Itiel E. Dror. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Itiel E. Dror. The network helps show where Itiel E. Dror may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Itiel E. Dror
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Itiel E. Dror.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Itiel E. Dror based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Itiel E. Dror. Itiel E. Dror is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dror, Itiel E.. (2020). Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias. Analytical Chemistry. 92(12). 7998–8004.162 indexed citations breakdown →
Dror, Itiel E., et al.. (2018). Examining the Role of Science in the Courtroom: Admissibility and Reliability of Forensic Science in the Courtroom. UCL Discovery (University College London).
14.
Nakhaeizadeh, Sherry, et al.. (2015). The Emergence of Cognitive Bias in Forensic Science and Criminal Investigations. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
Dror, Itiel E. & Robert Rosenthal. (2007). Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of fingerprint experts' decision making. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).7 indexed citations
18.
Dror, Itiel E.. (2006). Cognitive science serving security: Assuring useable and efficient biometric and technological solutions. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).3 indexed citations
19.
Dror, Itiel E.. (2004). The effects of screening, training, and experience of air force fighter pilots: the plasticity of the ability to extrapolate and track multiple objects in motion. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).2 indexed citations
20.
Ashman, Ori, Itiel E. Dror, Melissa A. Houlette, & Becca R. Levy. (2003). Preserved risk-taking skills in old age. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.