Graham Pike

1.8k total citations
50 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Graham Pike is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Education and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Graham Pike has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Education and 10 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Graham Pike's work include Face Recognition and Perception (15 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (10 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (9 papers). Graham Pike is often cited by papers focused on Face Recognition and Perception (15 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (10 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (9 papers). Graham Pike collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Graham Pike's co-authors include Richard I. Kemp, David Selby, Peter A. White, Keith Phillips, Nicola Brace, G Hole, Jim Turner, Virginia Harrison, Frank Pollick and Nicola T. Fear and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Forensic Science International.

In The Last Decade

Graham Pike

47 papers receiving 935 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Graham Pike United Kingdom	14	561	381	301	271	216	50	1.1k
Charles Keil United States	16	544 1.0×	262 0.7×	184 0.6×	166 0.6×	420 1.9×	42	2.1k
Alan P. Merriam United States	14	242 0.4×	104 0.3×	89 0.3×	124 0.5×	228 1.1×	89	1.3k
Juan Ignacio Pozo Spain	22	228 0.4×	37 0.1×	803 2.7×	126 0.5×	119 0.6×	79	1.4k
Jean-Jacques Nattiez Canada	12	215 0.4×	181 0.5×	33 0.1×	119 0.4×	116 0.5×	73	945
S. Debbie United States	13	685 1.2×	179 0.5×	22 0.1×	589 2.2×	698 3.2×	23	1.6k
Elizabeth A. Olson United States	12	600 1.1×	59 0.2×	53 0.2×	86 0.3×	150 0.7×	24	964
Caitlin M. Fausey United States	13	374 0.7×	77 0.2×	66 0.2×	316 1.2×	89 0.4×	29	988
Patricia Shehan Campbell United States	22	678 1.2×	73 0.2×	726 2.4×	80 0.3×	132 0.6×	94	1.6k
Lisa F. Smith New Zealand	14	353 0.6×	50 0.1×	378 1.3×	236 0.9×	61 0.3×	46	987
Mari–Pauliina Vainikainen Finland	19	51 0.1×	47 0.1×	432 1.4×	302 1.1×	93 0.4×	68	937

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Pike

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Pike

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Pike. The network helps show where Graham Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Pike

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Pike. Graham Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Sharp, Marie‐Louise, Virginia Harrison, Rachael Gribble, et al.. (2022). The mental health and wellbeing of spouses, partners and children of emergency responders: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 17(6). e0269659–e0269659. 19 indexed citations

Havard, Catriona, et al.. (2021). An international survey of applied face-matching training courses. Forensic Science International. 327. 110947–110947. 4 indexed citations

Philpot, Richard, Min Zhang, Avelie Stuart, et al.. (2021). Digital Detectives: Websleuthing Reduces Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Police Lineups. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 640513–640513. 3 indexed citations

Sharp, Marie‐Louise, et al.. (2020). Assessing the mental health and wellbeing of the Emergency Responder community in the UK. Open Research Online (The Open University). 11 indexed citations

Pike, Graham. (2020). Cultivating Ordinary Voices of Dissent: the Challenge for the Social Studies. 10(2). 3–11. 1 indexed citations

Pike, Graham, Nicola Brace, Jim Turner, Hayley Ness, & Annelies Vredeveldt. (2019). Advances in Facial Composite Technology, Utilizing Holistic Construction, Do Not Lead to an Increase in Eyewitness Misidentifications Compared to Older Feature-Based Systems. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 1962–1962. 3 indexed citations

Pike, Graham, et al.. (2019). Entitlement to Tell on Police Facebook Sites. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 22(5). 355–357. 7 indexed citations

Thirkettle, Martin, et al.. (2018). A Mobile App Delivering a Gamified Battery of Cognitive Tests Designed for Repeated Play (OU Brainwave): App Design and Cohort Study. JMIR Serious Games. 6(4). e10519–e10519. 6 indexed citations

Vossler, Andreas, et al.. (2017). Mad or Bad? A Critical Approach to Counselling and Forensic Psychology. 5 indexed citations

10.

Brace, Nicola, Graham Pike, Peter M. Allen, & Richard I. Kemp. (2006). Identifying composites of famous faces: Investigating memory, language and system issues. Psychology Crime and Law. 12(4). 351–366. 15 indexed citations

11.

Pike, Graham, et al.. (2005). Making faces with computers. Pragmatics & Cognition. 13(3). 459–479. 3 indexed citations

12.

Kemp, Richard I., Graham Pike, & Nicola Brace. (2001). Video-based identification procedures: Combining best practice and practical requirements when designing identification systems.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 7(4). 802–807. 8 indexed citations

13.

Brace, Nicola, et al.. (2001). Developmental Changes in the Effect of Inversion: Using a Picture Book to Investigate Face Recognition. Perception. 30(1). 85–94. 62 indexed citations

14.

Pike, Graham. (2000). Preparing Teachers for Global Citizenship: The Impact of the Specialization in International Education.. 10. 95–106. 2 indexed citations

15.

Selby, David & Graham Pike. (2000). Global Education: Relevant Learning for the Twenty-First Century.. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 33. 16 indexed citations

16.

Pike, Graham. (2000). Global Education and National Identity: In Pursuit of Meaning. Theory Into Practice. 39(2). 64–73. 88 indexed citations

17.

Pike, Graham. (1998). Global Education: Reflections from the Field.. 1 indexed citations

18.

Kemp, Richard I., et al.. (1996). Perception and Recognition of Normal and Negative Faces: The Role of Shape from Shading and Pigmentation Cues. Perception. 25(1). 37–52. 151 indexed citations

19.

Pike, Graham, et al.. (1989). Future time perspective: adolescents' predictions of their interpersonal lives in the future.. PubMed. 24(94). 289–301. 9 indexed citations

20.

Pike, Graham, et al.. (1989). Greenprints for Changing Schools. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact