Kimberlie Dean
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robin MurrayElizabeth WalshThomas FahyTerence DwyerLeigh BlizzardHind KhalifehMelissa J. GreenPreben Bo Mortensen
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (50 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (38 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (37 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetCirculationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kimberlie Dean
143 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Clinical Psychology 2.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 805
- Sociology and Political Science 760
- General Health Professions 574
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 495
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberlie Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberlie Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberlie Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberlie Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberlie Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberlie Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberlie Dean. The network helps show where Kimberlie Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberlie Dean
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberlie Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberlie Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberlie Dean. Kimberlie Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 72 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | Recognising, understanding and managing violent victimization | 1 |
| 20 | 297 |
About Kimberlie Dean
Kimberlie Dean is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 156 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (50 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (38 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (37 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.1k citations), Health (476 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (805 citations). Kimberlie Dean has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robin Murray, Elizabeth Walsh, Thomas Fahy, Terence Dwyer, Leigh Blizzard, Hind Khalifeh, Melissa J. Green, Preben Bo Mortensen, Stacy Tzoumakis and James F. Sallis. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Circulation and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.