Richard Fulford
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Building and Construction top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Craig StandingPeter E.D. LoveLlandis Barratt‐PughDenise GengatharenDenise JacksonYuliani SusenoNeda Kiani MaviMark Goh
- Topics
- Construction Project Management and Performance (7 papers)Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers)ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Science and Operations ResearchBuilding and ConstructionManagement Information Systems
In The Last Decade
Richard Fulford
14 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Management Science and Operations Research 147
- Building and Construction 116
- Strategy and Management 86
- Management Information Systems 71
- Social Psychology 30
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Fulford
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Fulford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Fulford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Fulford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Fulford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Fulford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Fulford. The network helps show where Richard Fulford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Fulford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Fulford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Fulford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Fulford. Richard Fulford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 189 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Eureka moments in research: Exploring abductive processes using four case examples | 4 |
| 14 | Effective Education Using Information Systems as Cognitive Tools | 1 |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | Understanding IT Costs: An Exploratory Study using the Structured Case Method | 4 |
| 17 | A conceptual model for ASP adoption | 1 |
About Richard Fulford
Richard Fulford is a scholar working on Communication, Management Information Systems and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 17 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Construction Project Management and Performance (7 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers) and ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (147 citations), Building and Construction (116 citations) and Management Information Systems (71 citations). Richard Fulford has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Craig Standing, Peter E.D. Love, Llandis Barratt‐Pugh, Denise Gengatharen, Denise Jackson, Yuliani Suseno, Neda Kiani Mavi, Mark Goh, Kerry Brown and Susanne Bahn. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, International Journal of Project Management and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.