Daniel Adler

437 citations
8 papers · 297 indexed · h-index 5

Daniel Adler

6 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Daniel Adler
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Management Science and Operations Research 154
  • Management Information Systems 58
  • Strategy and Management 96
  • Building and Construction 83
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 28
Replace Vered Holzmann with:
Vered Holzmann Israel
Richard Fulford Australia
Dennis J. Kulonda United States
Jere Lehtinen Finland
Gilles Garel France
Konrad Spang Germany
Kevin P. Grant United States
Ruth Murray-Webster United Kingdom
George Heaney United Kingdom
Agnar Johansen Norway
Daniel Adler relative to Vered Holzmann Israel Vered Holzmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Vered Holzmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Adler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Adler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Adler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Adler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Adler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Adler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Adler. The network helps show where Daniel Adler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Adler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Adler Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Adler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 2018137
3 201614
4
The relationship between project management and small to medium enterprise profitability
20151
5 201415
6
The Impact of Project Management on SME Productivity
20140
7
Mapping the field of Complexity Theory: a computational approach to understanding changes in the field
20148
8 2014122

About Daniel Adler

Daniel Adler is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Building and Construction and Strategy and Management, having authored 8 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Construction Project Management and Performance (4 papers), Quality and Supply Management (2 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (1 paper), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper), BIM and Construction Integration (1 paper), Operations Management Techniques (1 paper), Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 paper) and Facilities and Workplace Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (154 citations), Management Information Systems (58 citations), Strategy and Management (96 citations), Building and Construction (83 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (28 citations). Daniel Adler has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Julien Pollack and Shankar Sankaran. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Project Management, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Project Management Journal, Journal of Modern Literature and UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026