Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Chemical composition mapping with nanometre resolution by soft X-ray microscopy
2014329 citationsDavid A. Shapiro, Young-Sang Yu et al.Nature Photonicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Celestre
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Celestre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Celestre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Celestre more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Celestre
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Celestre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Celestre. The network helps show where Richard Celestre may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Celestre
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Celestre.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Celestre based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Celestre. Richard Celestre is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shapiro, David A., Young-Sang Yu, Tolek Tyliszczak, et al.. (2014). Chemical composition mapping with nanometre resolution by soft X-ray microscopy. Nature Photonics. 8(10). 765–769.329 indexed citations breakdown →
Goldberg, Kenneth A., Valeriy V. Yashchuk, Sheng Yuan, et al.. (2011). An experimental apparatus for diffraction-limites soft x-ray nanofocusing. Optical Engineering.4 indexed citations
Caldwell, W. A., M. Kunz, Richard Celestre, et al.. (2004). Laser Heated Diamond Anvil Cell at the Advanced Light Source. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2004.
Caldwell, W. A., Nobumichi Tamura, Richard Celestre, et al.. (2004). Shear at Twin Domain Boundaries inYBa2Cu3O7−x. Physical Review Letters. 92(21). 216105–216105.7 indexed citations
13.
Trame, Christine B., Alastair A. MacDowell, Richard Celestre, et al.. (2003). SIBYLS - A SAXS and protein crystallography beamline at the ALS. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
Spolenak, Ralph, D. Barr, M. E. Gross, et al.. (2001). Microtexture and strain in electroplated copper interconnects. eScholarship (California Digital Library).1 indexed citations
17.
MacDowell, Alastair A., Richard Celestre, Nobumichi Tamura, et al.. (2001). Submicron X-ray diffraction. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 467-468. 936–943.78 indexed citations
18.
MacDowell, Alastair A., Richard Celestre, Nobumichi Tamura, et al.. (2000). Submicron X-ray diffraction. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
19.
McHugo, Scott A., A. C. Thompson, C. Flink, et al.. (2000). Synchrotron-based impurity mapping. Journal of Crystal Growth. 210(1-3). 395–400.30 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.