Richard A. Owings

524 citations
14 papers · 374 indexed · h-index 7

Richard A. Owings

13 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Richard A. Owings
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 120
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 35
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 93
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 37
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
Replace Martina Rosenberg with:
Martina Rosenberg United States
Gregory W. Thompson Canada
Erica Shen United States
Özlem İzci Ay Türkiye
Mustafa Ertan Ay Türkiye
Barbro Sjögren Sweden
Eriko Matsumoto Japan
Aurore Curie France
Sergio Fonda Italy
M. J. Jaffe United States
Richard A. Owings relative to Martina Rosenberg United States Martina Rosenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.3×
Martina Rosenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard A. Owings

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard A. Owings's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard A. Owings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard A. Owings more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard A. Owings

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard A. Owings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard A. Owings. The network helps show where Richard A. Owings may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard A. Owings, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard A. Owings Line = papers co-authored together Richard A. Owings links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 20145
2 201446
3 20123
4 20112
5
Selective deficiency of HIF-1alpha in myeloid cells influences secondary intention wound healing in mouse skin.
201015
6 20065
7 200431
8 1983112
9 198252
10 19801
11 198067
12 19801
13 197929
14 19795

About Richard A. Owings

Richard A. Owings is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (1 paper), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1 paper) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (120 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (35 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (93 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (37 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (46 citations). Richard A. Owings has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R.D. Skinner, Edgar García‐Rill, Shirley Ann Gilmore, Charles M. Quick, Barry S. Stein, John D. Bransford, Alfred A. Baumeister, Catherine Morris, Nancy Vye and Richard H. Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Intelligence, Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine and Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026