Rhea Ingram
Impact in
-
- Ethics in Business and Education
- Marketing top 10%
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Papers in
-
- International Business and FDI 1
-
- Sport and Mega-Event Impacts 1
- Co-authors
- Mary Conway Dato‐on (1 shared paper)Valerie A. Taylor (1 shared paper)Steven J. Skinner (1 shared paper)Robert Dahlstrøm (1 shared paper)Robin L. Snipes (2 shared papers)Pingjun Jiang (1 shared paper)Donald R. Self (1 shared paper)Tony C. Garrett (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Business Research (2 papers)Journal of Business Ethics (2 papers)PubMed (1 paper)DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (1 paper)Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Rhea Ingram
7 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Information Systems and Management 163
- Marketing 97
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 86
- Strategy and Management 88
- Safety Research 46
Countries citing papers authored by Rhea Ingram
This map shows the geographic impact of Rhea Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhea Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhea Ingram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rhea Ingram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rhea Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rhea Ingram. The network helps show where Rhea Ingram may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Rhea Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 199 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 109 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 6 | Motivators of Collegiate Sport Attendance: A Comparison Across Demographic Groups | 2017 | 6 |
| 7 | 2011 | 6 |
About Rhea Ingram
Rhea Ingram is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Gender Studies and Safety Research, having authored 7 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports, Gender, and Society (2 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (1 paper), Academic integrity and plagiarism (1 paper), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper), International Business and FDI (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (163 citations), Marketing (97 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (86 citations), Strategy and Management (88 citations) and Safety Research (46 citations). Rhea Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Mary Conway Dato‐on, Valerie A. Taylor, Steven J. Skinner, Robert Dahlstrøm, Robin L. Snipes, Pingjun Jiang, Donald R. Self and Tony C. Garrett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Business Ethics, PubMed, DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) and Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.