Rebecca Langlands

1.2k total citations
12 papers, 197 citations indexed

About

Rebecca Langlands is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Rebecca Langlands has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 197 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Anthropology, 4 papers in Philosophy and 3 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Rebecca Langlands's work include Classical Antiquity Studies (8 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (3 papers) and Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers). Rebecca Langlands is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (8 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (3 papers) and Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers). Rebecca Langlands collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Rebecca Langlands's co-authors include R. M. Dudley, E. M. Stein, Jay Feldman, Bertram Kostant, Kate Fisher, Raphael Woolf, Jed W. Atkins, Christopher Gill, Brad Inwood and Ingo Gildenhard and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Lecture notes in mathematics and Nations and Nationalism.

In The Last Decade

Rebecca Langlands

9 papers receiving 160 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rebecca Langlands United Kingdom	5	79	52	42	24	24	12	197
David Schaps Israel	9	140 1.8×	76 1.5×	5 0.1×	25 1.0×	75 3.1×	23	284
Mark D. Meyerson United States	10	29 0.4×	53 1.0×	107 2.5×	37 1.5×	45 1.9×	44	289
Harry L. Levy United Kingdom	10	100 1.3×	36 0.7×	39 0.9×	5 0.2×	41 1.7×	30	262
Gedaliahu G. Stroumsa Israel	8	31 0.4×	63 1.2×	16 0.4×	11 0.5×	92 3.8×	25	178
Douglas Jesseph United States	9	58 0.7×	34 0.7×	28 0.7×	12 0.5×	4 0.2×	30	330
Jacques Brunschwig France	9	151 1.9×	40 0.8×	17 0.4×	5 0.2×	137 5.7×	38	349
Luciano Canfora Italy	7	78 1.0×	49 0.9×	13 0.3×		59 2.5×	75	190
B.C. or A.D. Ovid	9	132 1.7×	36 0.7×	35 0.8×		54 2.3×	64	297
Michael R. Lynn United States	9	68 0.9×	37 0.7×	63 1.5×		9 0.4×	28	265
L. D. Reynolds United Kingdom	5	43 0.5×	29 0.6×	30 0.7×		32 1.3×	9	163

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Langlands

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Langlands's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Langlands with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Langlands more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Langlands

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Langlands. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Langlands. The network helps show where Rebecca Langlands may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Langlands

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Langlands. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Langlands based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Langlands. Rebecca Langlands is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Woolf, Raphael, Raphael Woolf, Raphael Woolf, et al.. (2023). Cicero's ‘De Officiis'. Cambridge University Press eBooks.

2.

Langlands, Rebecca. (2018). Exemplary Ethics in Ancient Rome. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations

3.

Fisher, Kate, et al.. (2017). Illustrating phallic worship: uses of material objects and the production of sexual knowledge in eighteenth-century antiquarianism and early twentieth-century sexual science. Word & Image. 33(3). 324–337. 4 indexed citations

4.

Langlands, Rebecca. (2015). Roman exemplarity: mediating between general and particular. 82–94. 2 indexed citations

5.

Langlands, Rebecca. (2014). Pliny’s “Role Models of Both Sexes”: Gender and exemplarity in the Letters. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations

6.

Langlands, Rebecca. (2011). RomanExemplaand Situation Ethics: Valerius Maximus and Cicerode Officiis. The Journal of Roman Studies. 101. 100–122. 9 indexed citations

7.

Langlands, Rebecca. (2008). ‘Reading for the moral’ in Valerius Maximus: the Case ofseveritas. Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter). 54. 160–187. 9 indexed citations

8.

Langlands, Rebecca. (2006). Sexual Morality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 81 indexed citations

9.

Langlands, Rebecca. (2002). 'Can you tell what it is yet?': descriptions of sex change in ancient literature [Paper in: The Verbal and the Visual: Cultures of Ekphrasis in Antiquity. Elsner, Jas (ed.)]. Ramus. 31. 91. 1 indexed citations

10.

Langlands, Rebecca. (2002). ‘Can You Tell What it is Yet?’ Descriptions of Sex Change in Ancient Literature. Ramus. 31(1-2). 91–110. 1 indexed citations

11.

Langlands, Rebecca. (1999). Britishness or Englishness? The Historical Problem of National Identity in Britain. Nations and Nationalism. 5(1). 53–69. 35 indexed citations

12.

Dudley, R. M., Jay Feldman, Bertram Kostant, Rebecca Langlands, & E. M. Stein. (1970). Lectures in modern analysis and applications I. Lecture notes in mathematics. 209–211. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact