David Schaps

1.1k citations
23 papers · 284 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

David Schaps

17 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers

David Schaps
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Theoretical Computer Science 30
  • Anthropology 140
  • Archeology 75
  • Religious studies 31
  • Archeology 4
Replace J. C. Heesterman with:
J. C. Heesterman Netherlands
A. F. P. Hulsewé Netherlands
B.C. or A.D. Ovid
Eugenio Garin Italy
D. E. Mungello United States
Marc Fumaroli France
Roger Beck Canada
John F. Makowski United States
William J. Courtenay United States
Rudi Matthee United States
David Schaps relative to J. C. Heesterman Netherlands J. C. Heesterman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. C. Heesterman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Schaps

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Schaps's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Schaps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Schaps more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Schaps

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Schaps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Schaps. The network helps show where David Schaps may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside David Schaps, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Schaps Line = papers co-authored together David Schaps links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198061
2 197746
3 200343
4 198734
5 201319
6 198217
7 199814
8
Classical studies in honor of David Sohlberg
199613
9 201311
10 20106
11 19804
12 19754
13 20172
14 19912
15 20032
16 20172
17
Law in the documents of the Judaean desert
20051
18 19821
19 19961
20 19791

About David Schaps

David Schaps is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Anthropology, Mathematical Physics, History and Philosophy of Science and Law, having authored 23 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (4 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (30 citations), Anthropology (140 citations), Archeology (75 citations), Religious studies (31 citations) and Archeology (4 citations). David Schaps has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Sarah B. Pomeroy, Stephanie Coontz, Mikhail G. Katz, Steven Shnider, Vladimir Kanovei, R. Ely, S. S. Kutateladze, David Sherry, Léopold Migeotte and Thomas Mormann. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical Quarterly, Classical Philology, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Hellenic Studies and Scripta classica Israelica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026