Brad Inwood
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Anthropology top 1%
- Archeology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Religious studies top 2%
- Co-authors
- David E. HahmCarl A. HuffmanGerard WatsonTroels Engberg‐PedersenDorothea FredeRaphael WoolfLucius Annaeus SenecaR. W. Sharples
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (41 papers)Classical Antiquity Studies (22 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (10 papers)
- Cited by
- PhilosophyAnthropologyArcheology
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Brad Inwood
52 papers receiving 557 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Philosophy 528
- Anthropology 376
- Archeology 279
- Sociology and Political Science 89
- Religious studies 48
Countries citing papers authored by Brad Inwood
This map shows the geographic impact of Brad Inwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brad Inwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brad Inwood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brad Inwood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brad Inwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brad Inwood. The network helps show where Brad Inwood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brad Inwood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brad Inwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brad Inwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brad Inwood. Brad Inwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age | 18 |
| 5 | Selected philosophical letters | 12 |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | Language and learning : philosophy of language in the Hellenistic Age : proceedings of the Ninth Symposium Hellenisticum | 3 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 68 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Assent and argument : studies in Cicero's Academic books : proceedings of the 7th Symposium Hellenisticum (Utrecht, August 21-25, 1995) | 2 |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | Hierocles: theory and argument in the second century AD | 14 |
About Brad Inwood
Brad Inwood is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology and Archeology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (41 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (22 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (528 citations), Anthropology (376 citations) and Archeology (279 citations). Brad Inwood has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David E. Hahm, Carl A. Huffman, Gerard Watson, Troels Engberg‐Pedersen, Dorothea Frede, Raphael Woolf, Lucius Annaeus Seneca, R. W. Sharples, David Sedley and Malcolm Schofield. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.