Raphael Woolf
- Philosophy top 2%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 15
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 2
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 1
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classical Antiquity Studies 4
- Archeology top 10%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 2
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 1
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 3
- Co-authors
- Marcus Tullius CıceroBrad InwoodJulia AnnasChristopher GillJed W. AtkinsIngo GildenhardJames E. G. ZetzelRebecca Langlands
- Cited by
- PhilosophyAnthropologyArcheology
- Journals
- Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy (3 papers)Phronesis (3 papers)The Philosophical Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Raphael Woolf
24 papers receiving 133 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Philosophy 127
- Anthropology 59
- Archeology 33
- History and Philosophy of Science 8
- Classics 5
Countries citing papers authored by Raphael Woolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Raphael Woolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raphael Woolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raphael Woolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raphael Woolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raphael Woolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raphael Woolf. The network helps show where Raphael Woolf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Raphael Woolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 4 | Knowing How to Ask: A Discussion of Gail Fine, The Possibility of Inquiry | 2015 | 1 |
| 5 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 11 | Misology and Truth | 2007 | 8 |
| 12 | Why is Rhetoric not a Skill | 2004 | 4 |
| 13 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 29 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 6 |
About Raphael Woolf
Raphael Woolf is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 176 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (15 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper) and Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (127 citations), Anthropology (59 citations) and Archeology (33 citations). Raphael Woolf has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marcus Tullius Cıcero, Brad Inwood, Julia Annas, Christopher Gill, Jed W. Atkins, Ingo Gildenhard, James E. G. Zetzel, Rebecca Langlands, Katharina Volk and Geert Roskam. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, Phronesis, The Philosophical Review, Mind and The Classical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.