Rebecca Chamberlain
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Johan WagemansNicola BrunswickI. C. McManusJennifer E. MerrillJennifer P. ReadHoward RileyCaitlin MullinRuth Van der Hallen
- Topics
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (18 papers)Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (16 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeuroImageScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rebecca Chamberlain
42 papers receiving 781 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Cognitive Neuroscience 434
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 312
- Social Psychology 106
- Epidemiology 98
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 82
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Chamberlain
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Chamberlain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Chamberlain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Chamberlain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Chamberlain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Chamberlain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Chamberlain. The network helps show where Rebecca Chamberlain may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Chamberlain
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Chamberlain. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Chamberlain based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Chamberlain. Rebecca Chamberlain is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 59 | |
| 19 | 42 | |
| 20 | 122 |
About Rebecca Chamberlain
Rebecca Chamberlain is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 42 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (18 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (16 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (312 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (434 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (53 citations). Rebecca Chamberlain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Johan Wagemans, Nicola Brunswick, I. C. McManus, Jennifer E. Merrill, Jennifer P. Read, Howard Riley, Caitlin Mullin, Ruth Van der Hallen, Hanne Huygelier and Joseph J. Siev. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.