Lee de‐Wit

2.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
53 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Lee de‐Wit is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lee de‐Wit has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lee de‐Wit's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers). Lee de‐Wit is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers). Lee de‐Wit collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and United States. Lee de‐Wit's co-authors include Johan Wagemans, Ruth Van der Hallen, Kris Evers, Sander Van de Cruys, Bart Boets, Lien Van Eylen, Pieter Moors, Vebjørn Ekroll, Simon R. Jones and Charles Fernyhough and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Lee de‐Wit

51 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Precise minds in uncertain worlds: Predictive coding in autism.

2014 567 citations Kris Evers, Ruth Van der Hallen et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lee de‐Wit Belgium	18	1.1k	300	246	189	165	53	1.3k
Sander Van de Cruys Belgium	16	1.2k 1.1×	365 1.2×	296 1.2×	240 1.3×	212 1.3×	31	1.4k
Phil McAleer United Kingdom	18	1.2k 1.1×	260 0.9×	500 2.0×	317 1.7×	141 0.9×	30	1.7k
Sarah Weigelt Germany	21	1.2k 1.2×	278 0.9×	272 1.1×	185 1.0×	217 1.3×	53	1.6k
Bernadette M. Jansma Netherlands	24	1.2k 1.1×	422 1.4×	368 1.5×	197 1.0×	57 0.3×	60	1.7k
Joshua K. Hartshorne United States	17	870 0.8×	457 1.5×	433 1.8×	194 1.0×	77 0.5×	44	1.7k
Anat Maril Israel	21	2.2k 2.1×	360 1.2×	496 2.0×	421 2.2×	94 0.6×	42	2.7k
William Hirstein United States	12	965 0.9×	104 0.3×	357 1.5×	316 1.7×	185 1.1×	30	1.3k
David Anaki Israel	17	983 0.9×	177 0.6×	644 2.6×	246 1.3×	156 0.9×	39	1.5k
Stefan Scherbaum Germany	20	694 0.6×	121 0.4×	355 1.4×	251 1.3×	171 1.0×	75	1.2k
Melina R. Uncapher United States	25	2.0k 1.9×	228 0.8×	399 1.6×	220 1.2×	91 0.6×	37	2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Lee de‐Wit

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lee de‐Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee de‐Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee de‐Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lee de‐Wit

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee de‐Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee de‐Wit. The network helps show where Lee de‐Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lee de‐Wit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lee de‐Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lee de‐Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lee de‐Wit. Lee de‐Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Madsen, Jens Koed, et al.. (2025). Belief polarization can be caused by disagreements over source independence: Computational modelling, experimental evidence, and applicability to real-world politics. Cognition. 259. 106126–106126. 1 indexed citations

de‐Wit, Lee, et al.. (2024). Affective polarization within parties. Political Psychology. 46(1). 49–69. 1 indexed citations

de‐Wit, Lee, et al.. (2024). The N400 effect captures nuances in implicit political preferences. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 16730–16730.

de‐Wit, Lee, et al.. (2021). The Grammar of Politics, through the lens of Surveys and Web-based Social Network methods. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations

Rollwage, Max, Leor Zmigrod, Lee de‐Wit, Raymond J. Dolan, & Stephen M. Fleming. (2019). What Underlies Political Polarization? A Manifesto for Computational Political Psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 23(10). 820–822. 36 indexed citations

de‐Wit, Lee, Hanne Huygelier, Ruth Van der Hallen, Rebecca Chamberlain, & Johan Wagemans. (2017). Developing the Leuven Embedded Figures Test (L-EFT): testing the stimulus features that influence embedding. PeerJ. 5. e2862–e2862. 23 indexed citations

Moors, Pieter, Johan Wagemans, & Lee de‐Wit. (2016). Faces in commonly experienced configurations enter awareness faster due to their curvature relative to fixation. PeerJ. 4. e1565–e1565. 14 indexed citations

de‐Wit, Lee, David M. Alexander, Vebjørn Ekroll, & Johan Wagemans. (2016). Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 23(5). 1415–1428. 74 indexed citations

Abeele, Vero Vanden, et al.. (2015). Game-based Experiments on Human Visual Attention. Foundations of Digital Games. 1–9. 4 indexed citations

10.

Moors, Pieter, Johan Wagemans, Raymond van Ee, & Lee de‐Wit. (2015). No evidence for surface organization in Kanizsa configurations during continuous flash suppression. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 78(3). 902–914. 29 indexed citations

11.

Moutsiana, Christina, et al.. (2014). Case study of unexplained visual field loss and perceptual deficits in the presence of normal early visual function. Journal of Vision. 14(10). 48–48. 1 indexed citations

12.

Evers, Kris, Lee de‐Wit, Ruth Van der Hallen, et al.. (2014). Brief Report: Reduced Grouping Interference in Children with ASD: Evidence from a Multiple Object Tracking Task. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 44(7). 1779–87. 18 indexed citations

13.

Moors, Pieter, Johan Wagemans, & Lee de‐Wit. (2014). Moving Stimuli Are Less Effectively Masked Using Traditional Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) Compared to a Moving Mondrian Mask (MMM): A Test Case for Feature-Selective Suppression and Retinotopic Adaptation. PLoS ONE. 9(5). e98298–e98298. 26 indexed citations

14.

Vancleef, Kathleen, et al.. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST).. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 4 indexed citations

15.

Torfs, Katrien, Kathleen Vancleef, Christophe Lafosse, Johan Wagemans, & Lee de‐Wit. (2013). The Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST), an online test to assess mid-level visual perception. Behavior Research Methods. 46(2). 472–487. 46 indexed citations

16.

de‐Wit, Lee, Jonas Kubilius, Johan Wagemans, & Hans Op de Beeck. (2012). Bistable Gestalts reduce activity in the whole of V1, not just the retinotopically predicted parts. Journal of Vision. 12(11). 12–12. 39 indexed citations

17.

de‐Wit, Lee, Carmen E. Lefevre, Robert W. Kentridge, Geraint Rees, & Ayşe Pınar Saygın. (2011). Investigating the Status of Biological Stimuli as Objects of Attention in Multiple Object Tracking. PLoS ONE. 6(3). e16232–e16232. 5 indexed citations

18.

Kentridge, Robert W., Lee de‐Wit, & C.A. Heywood. (2008). What is attended in spatial attention. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 15(4). 105–111. 1 indexed citations

19.

de‐Wit, Lee, Robert W. Kentridge, & A. David Milner. (2008). Object-based attention and visual area LO. Neuropsychologia. 47(6). 1483–1490. 18 indexed citations

20.

Jones, Simon R., Lee de‐Wit, Charles Fernyhough, & Elizabeth Meins. (2007). A new spin on the Wheel of Fortune: Priming of action-authorship judgements and relation to psychosis-like experiences. Consciousness and Cognition. 17(3). 576–586. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact