Cinzia Di Dio
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Co-authors
- Vittorio GalleseGiacomo RizzolattiAntonella MarchettiDavide MassaroEmiliano MacalusoGabriella GilliFederico ManziGiuseppe Di Cesare
- Topics
- Child and Animal Learning Development (16 papers)Social Robot Interaction and HRI (13 papers)Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (12 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Cinzia Di Dio
62 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Cognitive Neuroscience 934
- Social Psychology 663
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 467
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 202
- Sensory Systems 196
Countries citing papers authored by Cinzia Di Dio
This map shows the geographic impact of Cinzia Di Dio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cinzia Di Dio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cinzia Di Dio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cinzia Di Dio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cinzia Di Dio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cinzia Di Dio. The network helps show where Cinzia Di Dio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cinzia Di Dio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cinzia Di Dio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cinzia Di Dio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cinzia Di Dio. Cinzia Di Dio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 56 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 137 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About Cinzia Di Dio
Cinzia Di Dio is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (16 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (13 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (934 citations), Sensory Systems (196 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (467 citations). Cinzia Di Dio has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vittorio Gallese, Giacomo Rizzolatti, Antonella Marchetti, Davide Massaro, Emiliano Macaluso, Gabriella Gilli, Federico Manzi, Giuseppe Di Cesare, Angelo Cangelosi and Federica Savazzi. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.