Deborah Spence

15 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Deborah Spence
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Research and Theory 52
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 13
  • General Health Professions 115
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 23
  • Clinical Psychology 94
Replace Diane R. Lancaster with:
Diane R. Lancaster United States
Marja‐Leena Perälä Finland
Carolyn Sanders United States
Derek Sellman United Kingdom
Kathleen M. May United States
Rona Pillay Australia
Leslie Graham Canada
Barbara Love Canada
Ruby Walter Australia
Sylvia Barton Canada
Deborah Spence relative to Diane R. Lancaster United States Diane R. Lancaster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Diane R. Lancaster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Spence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Spence's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Spence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Spence more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Spence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Spence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Spence. The network helps show where Deborah Spence may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Spence, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Spence Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Spence links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 20233
2 20231
3 201936
4 201810
5 20181
6 201631
7 201211
8
Preparing registered nurses depends on "us and us and all of us".
201211
9 201238
10 20083
11 2007126
12 200718
13 200140
14 200135
15 199415

About Deborah Spence

Deborah Spence is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Philosophy, General Social Sciences and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (3 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (2 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (52 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations), General Health Professions (115 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (23 citations) and Clinical Psychology (94 citations). Deborah Spence has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Smythe, Sharon L. Sims, Melinda M. Swenson, Pamela M. Ironside, Judy Mannix, Debra Jackson, Stephen Neville, Marion Hunter, Catherine Cook and Jonathon Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nursing Inquiry, Journal of Professional Nursing, Journal of Holistic Nursing and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026