Rachael Ruegg

811 total citations · 1 hit paper
36 papers, 486 citations indexed

About

Rachael Ruegg is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Education and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachael Ruegg has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 486 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 21 papers in Education and 18 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Rachael Ruegg's work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (18 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (13 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (11 papers). Rachael Ruegg is often cited by papers focused on EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (18 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (13 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (11 papers). Rachael Ruegg collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Japan and Canada. Rachael Ruegg's co-authors include Nicola Galloway, Omid Khatin‐Zadeh, Hassan Banaruee, Jennifer Holland, Yongqi Gu, Yuko Sato, Ha Thi Thu Hoang and Stephen Skalicky and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, TESOL Quarterly and Applied Linguistics.

In The Last Decade

Rachael Ruegg

32 papers receiving 451 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The provision of student support on English Medium Instruction programmes in Japan and China

2020 119 citations Nicola Galloway, Rachael Ruegg Journal of English for Academic Purposes profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rachael Ruegg New Zealand	9	274	262	206	138	40	36	486
Yeonsuk Cho United States	10	134 0.5×	181 0.7×	128 0.6×	88 0.6×	40 1.0×	18	317
Adem Soruç Türkiye	13	442 1.6×	109 0.4×	309 1.5×	106 0.8×	81 2.0×	33	537
Jingjing Hu Australia	9	141 0.5×	146 0.6×	142 0.7×	130 0.9×	44 1.1×	11	358
Slobodanka Dimova Denmark	11	217 0.8×	72 0.3×	212 1.0×	79 0.6×	81 2.0×	32	372
Ian Walkinshaw Australia	11	297 1.1×	103 0.4×	300 1.5×	61 0.4×	118 3.0×	19	447
María del Pilar Agustín Llach Spain	13	205 0.7×	68 0.3×	243 1.2×	285 2.1×	27 0.7×	45	421
Ana Cristina Lahuerta Martı́nez Spain	9	148 0.5×	81 0.3×	150 0.7×	140 1.0×	17 0.4×	40	293
Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe Spain	15	769 2.8×	123 0.5×	400 1.9×	210 1.5×	94 2.4×	42	858
Francisco Lorenzo Spain	14	713 2.6×	136 0.5×	314 1.5×	154 1.1×	89 2.2×	34	779
Mohammad Mosiur Rahman Malaysia	15	360 1.3×	198 0.8×	286 1.4×	58 0.4×	177 4.4×	45	596

Countries citing papers authored by Rachael Ruegg

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachael Ruegg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachael Ruegg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachael Ruegg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachael Ruegg

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachael Ruegg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachael Ruegg. The network helps show where Rachael Ruegg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachael Ruegg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachael Ruegg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachael Ruegg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachael Ruegg. Rachael Ruegg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ruegg, Rachael. (2025). Assessment of written assignments in first-year humanities and social sciences courses: textual features of academic writing. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice. 32(1). 60–76.

Ruegg, Rachael, et al.. (2023). Manner and Quality of Negotiation During L2 Collaborative Writing. Applied Linguistics. 46(1). 35–52. 3 indexed citations

Ruegg, Rachael. (2023). “It’s a pain, but it’s not like the end of the world”: Students’ experiences of emergency remote teaching. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 33–46. 3 indexed citations

Ruegg, Rachael, et al.. (2022). Towards a better understanding of an academic success center in an EMI context. Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning. 30(1). 6–23. 2 indexed citations

Galloway, Nicola & Rachael Ruegg. (2022). English Medium Instruction (EMI) lecturer support needs in Japan and China. System. 105. 102728–102728. 34 indexed citations

Ruegg, Rachael, et al.. (2021). Beyond comprehension: Reading requirements in first-year undergraduate courses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 55. 101071–101071. 7 indexed citations

Ruegg, Rachael. (2021). Supporting EMI Students Outside of the Classroom: Evidence from Japan. 2 indexed citations

Galloway, Nicola & Rachael Ruegg. (2020). The provision of student support on English Medium Instruction programmes in Japan and China. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 45. 100846–100846. 119 indexed citations breakdown →

Ruegg, Rachael, et al.. (2020). Effects of pathways into university on the academic success of international undergraduate students. Higher Education Research & Development. 40(6). 1283–1297. 5 indexed citations

10.

Ruegg, Rachael, et al.. (2019). “Digging Deep”: Using the Task Involvement Load Hypothesis to analyse textbooks for vocabulary learning potential. 1(1). 17–28. 1 indexed citations

11.

Ruegg, Rachael. (2018). Providing effective feedback on L2 academic writing. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :. 161–178. 1 indexed citations

12.

Banaruee, Hassan, Omid Khatin‐Zadeh, & Rachael Ruegg. (2018). Recasts vs. direct corrective feedback on writing performance of high school EFL learners. Cogent Education. 5(1). 1455333–1455333. 14 indexed citations

13.

Ruegg, Rachael. (2017). Learner revision practices and perceptions of peer and teacher feedback. Writing & Pedagogy. 9(2). 275–300. 8 indexed citations

14.

Ruegg, Rachael. (2015). Differences in the Uptake of Peer and Teacher Feedback. RELC Journal. 46(2). 131–145. 48 indexed citations

15.

Ruegg, Rachael. (2014). The effect of assessment of peer feedback on the quantity and quality of feedback given. 24–43. 4 indexed citations

16.

Ruegg, Rachael. (2014). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. Language Learning Journal. 46(2). 87–102. 93 indexed citations

17.

Ruegg, Rachael, et al.. (2013). Rater sensitivity to lexical accuracy, sophistication and range when assessing writing. Assessing Writing. 18(2). 173–181. 11 indexed citations

18.

Ruegg, Rachael. (2010). Aspects affecting confidence in writing. 21(21). 123–135. 3 indexed citations

19.

Ruegg, Rachael, et al.. (2010). Confidence in writing: the effect of feedback. 21. 137–166. 1 indexed citations

20.

Ruegg, Rachael. (2009). How student-oriented is English language education in Japan?. 21(21). 401–427. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact