Phillip Sanger

53 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Phillip Sanger
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Architecture 20
  • Condensed Matter Physics 83
  • Media Technology 44
  • Biomedical Engineering 200
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 150
Replace Enrico Gianfranco Campari with:
Enrico Gianfranco Campari Italy
Linlin Wang China
J.R. Yeargan United States
F. Rizzo Italy
H. Yamamoto Japan
Emily Allen United States
Petru Andrei United States
Serim Ilday Türkiye
Yih-Fong Tzeng Taiwan
Seulki Roh South Korea
Phillip Sanger relative to Enrico Gianfranco Campari Italy Enrico Gianfranco Campari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Enrico Gianfranco Campari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Sanger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Sanger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Sanger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Sanger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Sanger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Sanger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Sanger. The network helps show where Phillip Sanger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip Sanger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip Sanger Line = papers co-authored together Phillip Sanger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015124
2 199848
3 197947
4 199036
5 197431
6 201424
7 200020
8 198914
9 201112
10 199810
11
Westinghouse design of a forced flow Nb3Sn test coil for the Large Coil Program
19799
12 19989
13 19978
14 20168
15 20118
16 19978
17 19818
18 19996
19 19976
20 20006

About Phillip Sanger

Phillip Sanger is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Media Technology, Architecture and Education, having authored 56 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (13 papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (12 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (11 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (8 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (6 papers), Multilevel Inverters and Converters (5 papers), Educational Innovations and Challenges (5 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (20 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (83 citations), Media Technology (44 citations), Biomedical Engineering (200 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (150 citations). Phillip Sanger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Julia Ziyatdinova, Benjamin Long, Teresa Conner‐Kerr, Martín Tanaka, Jessica L. Sparks, Nicholas A. Vavalle, Michael D. Young, Anant Agarwal, A. Driessen and R. Griessen. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Solid-State Electronics, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Journal of The Electrochemical Society and Nuclear Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact