Nuclear Technology

6.9k papers and 63.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.9k papers published in Nuclear Technology in the last decades have received a total of 63.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Nuclear Technology usually cover Aerospace Engineering (4.0k papers), Materials Chemistry (3.8k papers) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (1.4k papers) specifically the topics of Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (3.3k papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (2.7k papers) and Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nuclear Technology are Edward M. Eyring, Jack Simons, Alexander Sesonske, Marcel Coz, R. H. Ritchie, J. A. Lockwood, John A. Shields, Pavel Hejzlar, Charles Forsberg and A.G. Croff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nuclear Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nuclear Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nuclear Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Nuclear Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nuclear Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nuclear Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nuclear Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025