Philipp Meyer‐Doyle

606 citations
18 papers · 414 indexed · h-index 8

Philipp Meyer‐Doyle

15 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Philipp Meyer‐Doyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Accounting 208
  • Strategy and Management 203
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 74
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 85
  • Economics and Econometrics 99
Replace Anura De Zoysa with:
Anura De Zoysa Australia
Hongyan Yang China
Dendi Ramdani Belgium
Daniel Han Ming Chng China
Jeffrey Q. Barden United States
Alexander Pepper United Kingdom
Michelle L. Zorn United States
Abbie Griffith Oliver United States
Elizabeth Lim United States
Myleen M. Leary United States
Philipp Meyer‐Doyle relative to Anura De Zoysa Australia Anura De Zoysa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Anura De Zoysa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Meyer‐Doyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Meyer‐Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Meyer‐Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Meyer‐Doyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Meyer‐Doyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Meyer‐Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Meyer‐Doyle. The network helps show where Philipp Meyer‐Doyle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Meyer‐Doyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Meyer‐Doyle Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Meyer‐Doyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20241
3 202227
4 202137
5 202064
6 202034
7 20202
8 201962
9 20190
10 20182
11 20172
12 20170
13 20173
14 201788
15
Alleviating Managerial Dilemmas in Human-Capital-Intensive Firms Through Incentives: Evidence from M&A Legal Advisors
20151
16 201538
17 201351
18 20122

About Philipp Meyer‐Doyle

Philipp Meyer‐Doyle is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research and Finance, having authored 18 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (6 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers) and Private Equity and Venture Capital (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (208 citations), Strategy and Management (203 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (74 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (85 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (99 citations). Philipp Meyer‐Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Sunkee Lee, Guoli Chen, Wei Shi, Constance E. Helfat, Olivier Chatain, Sterling Huang, Rui J. P. de Figueiredo, Evan Rawley, Denisa Mindruta and Vibha Gaba. Their work appears in journals such as Strategic Management Journal, Organization Science, Strategy Science, Academy of Management Proceedings and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026