Phil Davies
- Education top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Surgery
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark G RipponRichard WhiteSara McCartyNick HeatherIan RobertsonJames L. MasseyNick BosanquetJohn Stephenson
- Topics
- Student Assessment and Feedback (11 papers)Educational Technology and Assessment (8 papers)Wound Healing and Treatments (7 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsThe British Journal of PsychiatryAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSerbia
In The Last Decade
Phil Davies
25 papers receiving 474 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Education 281
- Rehabilitation 107
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 87
- Surgery 78
- Information Systems 64
Countries citing papers authored by Phil Davies
This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Davies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Davies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Davies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Davies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Davies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Davies. The network helps show where Phil Davies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phil Davies
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phil Davies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phil Davies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phil Davies. Phil Davies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | The computerized peer-assessment of digital storytelling in higher education | 1 |
| 8 | The Economic Impact of Hard-to-Heal Leg Ulcers | 16 |
| 9 | 69 | |
| 10 | The continual assessment of confidence or knowledge with hidden MCQ | 2 |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 128 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Phil Davies
Phil Davies is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy and Education, having authored 26 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Student Assessment and Feedback (11 papers), Educational Technology and Assessment (8 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (107 citations), Occupational Therapy (60 citations) and Education (281 citations). Phil Davies has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Mark G Rippon, Richard White, Sara McCarty, Nick Heather, Ian Robertson, James L. Massey, Nick Bosanquet, John Stephenson, Grégory Reychler and Taran Tatla. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.