Mark G Rippon

1.1k total citations
62 papers, 826 citations indexed

About

Mark G Rippon is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Surgery and Occupational Therapy. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark G Rippon has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 826 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Rehabilitation, 43 papers in Surgery and 30 papers in Occupational Therapy. Recurrent topics in Mark G Rippon's work include Wound Healing and Treatments (54 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (30 papers) and Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (30 papers). Mark G Rippon is often cited by papers focused on Wound Healing and Treatments (54 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (30 papers) and Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (30 papers). Mark G Rippon collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Mark G Rippon's co-authors include Karen Ousey, Alan A Rogers, Keith Cutting, Richard White, A.A. Rogers, Phil Davies, P. Spencer Davies, Leanne Atkin, Kate Springett and Cliff Richardson and has published in prestigious journals such as Biomaterials, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Journal of Microbiological Methods.

In The Last Decade

Mark G Rippon

59 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark G Rippon United Kingdom 16 549 309 242 137 109 62 826
Dot Weir United States 11 450 0.8× 195 0.6× 188 0.8× 98 0.7× 143 1.3× 24 659
Henrik Sönnergren Sweden 7 557 1.0× 167 0.5× 158 0.7× 197 1.4× 156 1.4× 9 797
Patricia Coutts Canada 17 539 1.0× 348 1.1× 288 1.2× 71 0.5× 247 2.3× 36 1.0k
Donna Cartwright United States 4 668 1.2× 249 0.8× 267 1.1× 173 1.3× 248 2.3× 6 1.0k
Marcia Nusgart United States 5 684 1.2× 253 0.8× 282 1.2× 173 1.3× 269 2.5× 7 973
Caroline Pang Sweden 2 539 1.0× 147 0.5× 151 0.6× 197 1.4× 155 1.4× 3 734
Karen Broussard United States 6 595 1.1× 183 0.6× 93 0.4× 280 2.0× 122 1.1× 11 907
Elizabeth Scanlon United Kingdom 8 294 0.5× 232 0.8× 105 0.4× 107 0.8× 78 0.7× 17 752
Richard Searle United Kingdom 12 484 0.9× 270 0.9× 199 0.8× 137 1.0× 148 1.4× 26 697
Joshua Mervis United States 7 473 0.9× 169 0.5× 340 1.4× 94 0.7× 238 2.2× 16 809

Countries citing papers authored by Mark G Rippon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark G Rippon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark G Rippon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark G Rippon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark G Rippon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark G Rippon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark G Rippon. The network helps show where Mark G Rippon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark G Rippon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark G Rippon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark G Rippon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark G Rippon. Mark G Rippon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rippon, Mark G, A.A. Rogers, & Karen Ousey. (2025). Glove breach occurrence during surgical procedures: the benefits of double/indicator system gloves. Journal of Hospital Infection. 161. 92–113.
2.
Blackburn, Joanna, Karen Ousey, Mark G Rippon, et al.. (2025). Applying Antimicrobial Strategies in Wound Care Practice: A Review of the Evidence. International Wound Journal. 22(6). e70684–e70684. 3 indexed citations
3.
Rippon, Mark G, et al.. (2023). Effectiveness of a polyhexamethylene biguanide-containing wound cleansing solution using experimental biofilm models. Journal of Wound Care. 32(6). 359–367. 4 indexed citations
4.
Ousey, Karen, Mark G Rippon, Alan A Rogers, & Joshua Totty. (2023). Considerations for an ideal post-surgical wound dressing aligned with antimicrobial stewardship objectives: a scoping review. Journal of Wound Care. 32(6). 334–347. 7 indexed citations
5.
Rippon, Mark G, Alan A Rogers, Karen Ousey, & Paul Chadwick. (2023). Experimental and clinical evidence for DACC-coated dressings: an update. Journal of Wound Care. 32(Sup8a). S13–S22. 6 indexed citations
6.
Ousey, Karen, Mark G Rippon, Alan A Rogers, & John Stephenson. (2022). Antimicrobial stewardship in wound care implementation and measuring outcomes: results of an e-survey. Journal of Wound Care. 31(1). 32–39. 3 indexed citations
7.
Ousey, Karen, et al.. (2021). Hydro-responsive wound dressings for treating hard-to-heal wounds: a narrative review of the clinical evidence. Journal of Wound Care. 30(12). 980–992. 4 indexed citations
8.
Veličković, Vladica, Paul Chadwick, Mark G Rippon, et al.. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of superabsorbent wound dressing versus standard of care in patients with moderate-to-highly exuding leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care. 29(4). 235–246. 5 indexed citations
9.
Rippon, Mark G, et al.. (2019). Treating drug-resistant wound pathogens with non-medicated dressings: an in vitro study. Journal of Wound Care. 28(9). 629–638. 12 indexed citations
10.
Rippon, Mark G, et al.. (2018). An in vitro assessment of bacterial transfer by products used in debridement. Journal of Wound Care. 27(10). 679–685. 1 indexed citations
11.
Chadwick, Paul, et al.. (2017). Enabling wound healing and preventing Limb Amputation: a cost-benefit case study of Hydro-Responsive Wound Dressings. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 13(4). 80–91. 2 indexed citations
12.
Rippon, Mark G, Karen Ousey, Alan A Rogers, & Leanne Atkin. (2016). Wound hydration versus maceration: understanding the differences. Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield). 12(3). 62–68. 7 indexed citations
13.
Ousey, Karen & Mark G Rippon. (2016). HydroClean® plus: A new perspective to wound cleansing and debridement. Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield). 12(1). 94–104. 8 indexed citations
14.
Ousey, Karen, Mark G Rippon, & John Stephenson. (2016). Barriers to wound debridement: Results of an online survey. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield). 12(4). 36–41. 1 indexed citations
15.
Rippon, Mark G, et al.. (2016). Incontinence-associated dermatitis: reducing adverse events. British Journal of Nursing. 25(18). 1016–1021. 5 indexed citations
16.
Ousey, Karen, et al.. (2015). A review of blisters caused by wound dressing components: Can they impede post-operative rehabilitation and discharge?. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. 21. 3–10. 7 indexed citations
17.
Cochrane, Christine A., et al.. (1999). Application of an in vitro model to evaluate bioadhesion of fibroblasts and epithelial cells to two different dressings. Biomaterials. 20(13). 1237–1244. 19 indexed citations
18.
Rogers, A.A., et al.. (1999). Adsorption of serum-derived proteins by primary dressings: implications for dressing adhesion to wounds. Journal of Wound Care. 8(8). 403–406. 19 indexed citations
19.
Rippon, Mark G, et al.. (1998). Ultrasound assessment of skin and wound tissue: comparison with histology. Skin Research and Technology. 4(3). 147–154. 42 indexed citations
20.
Walker, Mike, et al.. (1997). In Vitro Model(s) for the Percutaneous Delivery of Active Tissue Repair Agents. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 86(12). 1379–1384. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026