Peter Knight

5.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
92 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Peter Knight is a scholar working on Education, Computational Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Knight has authored 92 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Education, 21 papers in Computational Mechanics and 12 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Peter Knight's work include Granular flow and fluidized beds (20 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (10 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (6 papers). Peter Knight is often cited by papers focused on Granular flow and fluidized beds (20 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (10 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (6 papers). Peter Knight collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Peter Knight's co-authors include Hilary Arksey, Jonathan Seville, Mantz Yorke, T. Instone, D.J. Parker, E. A. S. Cavell, M.J. Adams, J.P.K. Seville, Hsiu‐Po Kuo and John Pearson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering Science.

In The Last Decade

Peter Knight

87 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Interviewing for Social Scientists

1999 629 citations Peter Knight et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Knight United Kingdom	28	1.2k	789	712	331	319	92	3.7k
K. S. Birdi Denmark	34	329 0.3×	232 0.3×	209 0.3×	245 0.7×	127 0.4×	99	5.3k
Martin Rhodes Australia	45	2.2k 1.9×	87 0.1×	1.1k 1.5×	413 1.2×	981 3.1×	186	5.4k
Elaine Martin United Kingdom	37	64 0.1×	1.3k 1.7×	309 0.4×	176 0.5×	34 0.1×	184	4.2k
Xueli Wang China	35	78 0.1×	1.2k 1.5×	341 0.5×	182 0.5×	61 0.2×	287	5.7k
etc. United Kingdom	26	55 0.0×	312 0.4×	205 0.3×	474 1.4×	63 0.2×	150	3.1k
John Gardner United States	27	102 0.1×	561 0.7×	192 0.3×	522 1.6×	69 0.2×	215	3.6k
Richard M. Felder United States	49	118 0.1×	8.0k 10.1×	1.2k 1.7×	403 1.2×	58 0.2×	201	15.3k
H. G. Müller Germany	19	131 0.1×	1.3k 1.7×	112 0.2×	1.3k 4.1×	20 0.1×	67	9.7k
Nick J. Fox United Kingdom	37	60 0.0×	323 0.4×	816 1.1×	1.4k 4.2×	23 0.1×	145	5.7k
James W. Gentry United States	39	278 0.2×	204 0.3×	58 0.1×	2.0k 6.0×	245 0.8×	304	6.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Knight

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Knight

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Knight. The network helps show where Peter Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Knight

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Knight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Knight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Knight. Peter Knight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Burton, Jennifer Kirsty, Martin Reid, Ciara Gribben, et al.. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on care-home mortality and life expectancy in Scotland. Age and Ageing. 50(4). 1029–1037. 15 indexed citations

2.

Knight, Peter, et al.. (2019). The Economic Humanities and the History of Financial Advice. American Literary History. 31(4). 661–686. 12 indexed citations

3.

Hendry, Anne, et al.. (2016). Improving Outcomes through Transformational Health and Social Care Integration – The Scottish Experience. Healthcare Quarterly. 19(2). 73–79. 10 indexed citations

4.

Knight, Peter. (2009). Introduction to the 50th Anniversary Issue ofContemporary Physics. Contemporary Physics. 50(1). 1–1. 1 indexed citations

5.

Yorke, Mantz & Peter Knight. (2004). Being strategic about employability. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 1 indexed citations

6.

Kuo, Hsiu‐Po, Peter Knight, D.J. Parker, M.J. Adams, & Jonathan Seville. (2004). Discrete element simulations of a high-shear mixer. Advanced Powder Technology. 15(3). 297–309. 40 indexed citations

7.

Knight, Peter, et al.. (2004). On control of particle size distribution in granulation using high-shear mixers. Powder Technology. 140(3). 169–175. 70 indexed citations

8.

Knight, Peter. (2004). Challenges in granulation technology. Powder Technology. 140(3). 156–162. 45 indexed citations

9.

Seville, Jonathan, T.G. Chuah, Vusumuzi Sibanda, & Peter Knight. (2003). Gas cleaning at high temperatures using rigid ceramic filters. Advanced Powder Technology. 14(6). 657–672. 20 indexed citations

10.

Knight, Peter. (2001). Structuring agglomerated products for improved performance. Powder Technology. 119(1). 14–25. 43 indexed citations

11.

Knight, Peter, A. Johansen, Henning Gjelstrup Kristensen, Torben Schæfer, & Jonathan Seville. (2000). An investigation of the effects on agglomeration of changing the speed of a mechanical mixer. Powder Technology. 110(3). 204–209. 80 indexed citations

12.

Knight, Peter. (1997). Masterclass : learning teaching and curriculum in taught master's degrees. Cassell eBooks. 24 indexed citations

13.

Knight, Peter, et al.. (1996). Quality and assessment. Quality Assurance in Education. 4(3). 3–10. 15 indexed citations

14.

Bridgwater, J., et al.. (1993). A phenomenological study of a batch mixer using a positron camera. Powder Technology. 76(3). 317–329. 60 indexed citations

15.

Knight, Peter. (1993). Turmoil in Success. Quality Assurance in Education. 1(1). 9–14. 6 indexed citations

16.

Offer, Gerald, et al.. (1989). The Structural Basis of the Water-Holding, Appearance and Toughness of Meat and Meat Products. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 8(1). 17. 202 indexed citations

17.

Knight, Peter, et al.. (1988). Measurement of powder cohesive strength with a penetration test. Powder Technology. 54(4). 279–283. 17 indexed citations

18.

Knight, Peter & J. Bridgwater. (1985). Comparison of methods for assessing powder attrition. Powder Technology. 44(1). 99–102. 2 indexed citations

19.

Knight, Peter. (1984). The 1984-85 NAB Planning Exercise: How Great a Failure?.. Higher education review. 17(1). 19–28. 2 indexed citations

20.

Knight, Peter, et al.. (1969). Fostering Global Perspectives in Undergraduate Marketing Students- A Kazakhstani/Canadian Collaboration. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 37(2). 47–67. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact