Torben Schæfer

49 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Torben Schæfer
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Pharmaceutical Science 890
  • Computational Mechanics 1.2k
  • Food Science 439
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 108
  • Mechanical Engineering 655
Replace James D. Litster with:
James D. Litster Australia
Ecevit Bilgili United States
Osmo Antikainen Finland
Markus Thommes Germany
John A. Hersey United Kingdom
Chinmay Ghoroi India
Nora Anne Urbanetz Germany
A.C. Bentham United Kingdom
Göran Frenning Sweden
Kei Miyanami Japan
Torben Schæfer relative to James D. Litster Australia James D. Litster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James D. Litster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Torben Schæfer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Torben Schæfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Torben Schæfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Torben Schæfer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Torben Schæfer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Torben Schæfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Torben Schæfer. The network helps show where Torben Schæfer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Torben Schæfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Torben Schæfer Line = papers co-authored together Torben Schæfer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987169
2 1996117
3 1985107
4 1990104
5 2005100
6 200194
7 200288
8 198587
9 200080
10 199679
11 198567
12 200163
13 198559
14 199953
15 198850
16 200249
17 200448
18 199443
19 199641
20 199341

About Torben Schæfer

Torben Schæfer is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Food Science and Biomaterials, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Granular flow and fluidized beds (30 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (16 papers), Protein purification and stability (15 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (9 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (6 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (5 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (5 papers) and Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (890 citations), Computational Mechanics (1.2k citations), Food Science (439 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (108 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (655 citations). Torben Schæfer has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Henning Gjelstrup Kristensen, Paul Martin Holm, Jakob Kristensen, Peter Kleinebudde, Per Holm, Jouko Yliruusi, Pirjo Luukkonen, Mikko Ritala, Peter Knight and A. Johansen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Powder Technology, Pharmaceutical Development and Technology and European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact