Replace Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers with:
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical EngineersChina
Colloid & Polymer ScienceGermany
Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process IntensificationChina
Advances in Colloid and Interface ScienceUnited States
Chemical Engineering & TechnologyGermany
The Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringCanada
Korean Journal of Chemical EngineeringSouth Korea
Journal of Thermal Analysis and CalorimetryChina
International Journal of Energy ResearchChina
Journal of Analytical and Applied PyrolysisChina
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical EngineersChinaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Advanced Powder Technology
Advanced Powder Technology · 1×
×1.346.0kMC
×0.929.6kME
×1.642.3kBE
×0.48.5kCM
×1.222.9kEEE
Citations per year, relative to Advanced Powder Technology
Advanced Powder Technology · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Advanced Powder Technology
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advanced Powder Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advanced Powder Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advanced Powder Technology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Advanced Powder Technology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Advanced Powder Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advanced Powder Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.