Patricia Wright

64 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Patricia Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Human-Computer Interaction 216
  • Health Information Management 158
  • Medical Terminology 5
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 191
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 175
Replace Virginia A. Diehl with:
Virginia A. Diehl United States
John P. Chin United States
J. M. Christian Bastien France
Peter Jan Schellens Netherlands
Judith Ramey United States
Celine Latulipe United States
Åsa Cajander Sweden
M.F. Steehouder Netherlands
Sharon McDonald United Kingdom
Gondy Leroy United States
Patricia Wright relative to Virginia A. Diehl United States Virginia A. Diehl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Virginia A. Diehl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patricia Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patricia Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patricia Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patricia Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patricia Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patricia Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patricia Wright. The network helps show where Patricia Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patricia Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patricia Wright Line = papers co-authored together Patricia Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199893
2 197390
3 201071
4 197766
5 200064
6 199863
7 199160
8 199856
9 198147
10 197141
11 197035
12 199934
13 196933
14 199831
15 197131
16 198330
17
An Empirical Comparison of Two Navigation Systems for Two Hypertexts.
198928
18 197827
19 196826
20 201025

About Patricia Wright

Patricia Wright is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (15 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (10 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Web Applications and Data Management (4 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), Information Architecture and Usability (4 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (216 citations), Health Information Management (158 citations), Medical Terminology (5 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (191 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (175 citations). Patricia Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy C Wyatt, Fraser Reid, Ann Lickorish, Daniel Kahneman, Seth Powsner, Else Nygren, Robert Milroy, Philip Barnard, Richard Grol and Adrian Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, The Lancet, Applied Ergonomics, Journal of Applied Psychology and Review of Research in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact