Peter Jan Schellens

1.8k total citations
39 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Peter Jan Schellens is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Jan Schellens has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 7 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Peter Jan Schellens's work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (8 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (7 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (7 papers). Peter Jan Schellens is often cited by papers focused on Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (8 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (7 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (7 papers). Peter Jan Schellens collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Peter Jan Schellens's co-authors include Menno D.T. de Jong, Maaike van den Haak, Maaike J. van den Haak, M.J.P. van Mulken, Luuk Van Waes, Christian Burgers, Hans Hoeken, J. van Gemert-Pijnen, M.G.R. Hendrix and Job van der Palen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Pragmatics, Journal of Hospital Infection and Government Information Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Peter Jan Schellens

35 papers receiving 911 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Jan Schellens Netherlands 15 222 170 155 145 138 39 1.0k
Patricia Wright United Kingdom 20 216 1.0× 191 1.1× 93 0.6× 224 1.5× 86 0.6× 69 1.3k
James H. Watt United States 21 115 0.5× 89 0.5× 81 0.5× 96 0.7× 475 3.4× 48 1.2k
Leo Lentz Netherlands 14 104 0.5× 55 0.3× 55 0.4× 103 0.7× 74 0.5× 47 668
M.F. Steehouder Netherlands 18 193 0.9× 62 0.4× 122 0.8× 181 1.2× 603 4.4× 66 1.7k
Ilkka Arminen Finland 17 146 0.7× 188 1.1× 64 0.4× 50 0.3× 182 1.3× 53 859
Theodore W. Frick United States 17 75 0.3× 63 0.4× 537 3.5× 85 0.6× 105 0.8× 45 1.1k
Andreas Frey Germany 17 54 0.2× 159 0.9× 519 3.3× 103 0.7× 311 2.3× 91 1.4k
Brian Smith United States 18 143 0.6× 45 0.3× 162 1.0× 81 0.6× 239 1.7× 88 1.1k
Patricia Wallace United States 9 63 0.3× 55 0.3× 355 2.3× 72 0.5× 397 2.9× 18 959
Katja Buntins Germany 13 127 0.6× 81 0.5× 660 4.3× 83 0.6× 148 1.1× 24 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Jan Schellens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Jan Schellens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Jan Schellens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Jan Schellens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Jan Schellens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Jan Schellens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Jan Schellens. The network helps show where Peter Jan Schellens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Jan Schellens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Jan Schellens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Jan Schellens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Jan Schellens. Peter Jan Schellens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Liebrecht, Christine, L.G.M.M. Hustinx, M.J.P. van Mulken, & Peter Jan Schellens. (2016). Krachtige taal. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 38(1). 57–79. 3 indexed citations
2.
Hoeken, Hans, et al.. (2013). Arguing about the likelihood of consequences: Laypeople's criteria to distinguish strong arguments from weak ones. Thinking & Reasoning. 20(1). 77–98. 20 indexed citations
3.
Burgers, Christian, M.J.P. van Mulken, & Peter Jan Schellens. (2013). On irony, images and creativity: A corpus-analytic approach. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 293–311. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hoeken, Hans, et al.. (2012). Arguing about desirable consequences: What constitutes a convincing argument?. Thinking & Reasoning. 18(3). 394–416. 37 indexed citations
5.
Burgers, Christian, M.J.P. van Mulken, & Peter Jan Schellens. (2011). Finding Irony: An Introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol. 26(3). 186–205. 69 indexed citations
6.
Schellens, Peter Jan, et al.. (2008). De redelijkheid en overtuigingskracht van normatief sterke en normatief zwakke argumenten. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 30(2). 117–132. 1 indexed citations
7.
Haak, Maaike J. van den, Menno D.T. de Jong, & Peter Jan Schellens. (2007). Evaluation of an Informational Web Site: Three Variants of the Think-aloud Method Compared. Technical Communication. 54(1). 58–71. 46 indexed citations
8.
Schellens, Peter Jan. (2006). ‘Bij vlagen loepzuiver’. Over argumentatie en stijl in betogende teksten. University of Twente Research Information. 28(4). 346–360. 3 indexed citations
9.
Gemert-Pijnen, J. van, M.G.R. Hendrix, Job van der Palen, & Peter Jan Schellens. (2005). Effectiveness of protocols for preventing occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in Dutch hospitals. Journal of Hospital Infection. 62(2). 166–173. 14 indexed citations
10.
Gemert-Pijnen, J. van, M.G.R. Hendrix, Job van der Palen, & Peter Jan Schellens. (2005). Performance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus protocols in Dutch hospitals. American Journal of Infection Control. 33(7). 377–384. 24 indexed citations
11.
Schellens, Peter Jan & Menno D.T. de Jong. (2004). Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures. Argumentation. 18(3). 295–323. 37 indexed citations
12.
Jong, Menno D.T. de & Peter Jan Schellens. (2002). Formative evaluation in document design: validity of the plus-minus method for the pretesting of public information brochures. University of Twente Research Information. 2. 123–130. 6 indexed citations
13.
Jong, Menno D.T. de & Peter Jan Schellens. (2001). Readers' Background Characteristics and Their Feedback on Documents: The Influence of Gender and Educational Level on Evaluation Results. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. 31(3). 267–281. 2 indexed citations
14.
Schellens, Peter Jan & Menno D.T. de Jong. (2000). Soorten argumenten in de voorlichting. University of Twente Research Information. 22(4). 288–308. 2 indexed citations
15.
Jong, Menno D.T. de & Peter Jan Schellens. (1998). Focus Groups or Individual Interviews? A Comparison of Text Evaluation Approaches.. Technical Communication. 45(1). 77–88. 18 indexed citations
16.
Schellens, Peter Jan, et al.. (1997). Reader-Focused Text Evaluation.. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 11(4). 2 indexed citations
17.
Schellens, Peter Jan & Menno D.T. de Jong. (1997). Revision of Public Information Brochures on the Basis of Reader Feedback. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 11(4). 483–501. 13 indexed citations
18.
Schellens, Peter Jan, et al.. (1994). Argument en tegenargument. Een inleiding in de analyse en beoordeling van betogende teksten. University of Twente Research Information. 5 indexed citations
19.
Schellens, Peter Jan. (1992). Bespreking van A. Edwards. Planning betwist. Communicatieve strategieën van boeren en natuurbeschermers in de ruilverkaveling Wommels. Proefschrift UvA. Utrecht: Van Arkel, 1990. University of Twente Research Information. 14(4). 328–332. 1 indexed citations
20.
Geest, Thea van der, Peter Jan Schellens, & Luuk Van Waes. (1992). Het model van Flower en Hayes: een cognitief procesmodel of een retorisch taakmodel?. University of Twente Research Information. 14(3). 161–176. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia Wright Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James H. Watt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leo Lentz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M.F. Steehouder Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ilkka Arminen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Theodore W. Frick Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andreas Frey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brian Smith Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia Wallace Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katja Buntins
Rankless by CCL
2026