Fraser Reid

9.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
26 papers, 6.5k citations indexed

About

Fraser Reid is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Fraser Reid has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 6.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Social Psychology, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Fraser Reid's work include Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (4 papers). Fraser Reid is often cited by papers focused on Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (4 papers). Fraser Reid collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Fraser Reid's co-authors include Donna J. Reid, Patricia Wright, Jonathan St. B. T. Evans, Susan Reed, Clifford Stott, Linden J. Ball, Richard D. Parsons, Phil Culverhouse, Ann Ley and Judy Edworthy and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Social Science & Medicine and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Fraser Reid

25 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self‐Categorization Theory

1987 5.8k citations Fraser Reid British Journal of Social Psychology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Fraser Reid United Kingdom	13	4.2k	2.6k	1.0k	782	768	26	6.5k
David Willer United States	23	4.7k 1.1×	2.4k 0.9×	1.0k 1.0×	934 1.2×	641 0.8×	65	7.0k
Herbert C. Kelman United States	40	5.4k 1.3×	2.0k 0.8×	558 0.5×	1.1k 1.4×	840 1.1×	142	9.1k
Howard Schuman United States	44	5.6k 1.3×	1.7k 0.6×	789 0.8×	399 0.5×	600 0.8×	123	9.4k
Craig McGarty Australia	43	5.1k 1.2×	3.0k 1.2×	579 0.6×	434 0.6×	982 1.3×	120	7.1k
Deborah H. Gruenfeld United States	23	3.4k 0.8×	3.0k 1.2×	685 0.7×	1.1k 1.4×	589 0.8×	42	6.0k
Dean G. Pruitt United States	36	5.0k 1.2×	2.0k 0.8×	575 0.6×	914 1.2×	347 0.5×	106	7.3k
Jan E. Stets United States	41	4.8k 1.1×	2.0k 0.8×	1.7k 1.7×	1.2k 1.5×	415 0.5×	77	8.8k
Michael J. Platow Australia	38	2.7k 0.6×	2.0k 0.8×	827 0.8×	1.1k 1.4×	296 0.4×	134	5.2k
Walter G. Stephan United States	42	6.3k 1.5×	4.0k 1.5×	1.1k 1.1×	383 0.5×	895 1.2×	125	8.8k
Evert Van de Vliert Netherlands	46	3.4k 0.8×	3.0k 1.2×	755 0.7×	2.3k 3.0×	712 0.9×	185	6.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser Reid

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser Reid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser Reid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser Reid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser Reid

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser Reid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser Reid. The network helps show where Fraser Reid may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fraser Reid

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fraser Reid. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fraser Reid based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fraser Reid. Fraser Reid is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Reid, Fraser & Donna J. Reid. (2008). The expressive and conversational affordances of mobile messaging. Behaviour and Information Technology. 29(1). 3–22. 49 indexed citations

2.

Reid, Donna J. & Fraser Reid. (2007). Text or Talk? Social Anxiety, Loneliness, and Divergent Preferences for Cell Phone Use. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 10(3). 424–435. 218 indexed citations

3.

Reid, Fraser & Susan Reed. (2007). Conversational grounding and visual access in collaborative design. CoDesign. 3(2). 111–122. 7 indexed citations

4.

Reid, Donna J. & Fraser Reid. (2005). Online Focus Groups: An In-depth Comparison of Computer-mediated and Conventional Focus Group Discussions. International Journal of Market Research. 47(2). 131–162. 108 indexed citations

5.

Reid, Fraser & Susan Reed. (2004). Speaker-centredness and participatory listening in pre-expert engineering design teams. CoDesign. 1(1). 39–60. 11 indexed citations

6.

Reid, Fraser & Donna J. Reid. (2004). Text appeal: the psychology of SMS texting and its implications for the design of mobile phone interfaces. Campus-Wide Information Systems. 21(5). 196–200. 21 indexed citations

7.

Reid, Donna J. & Fraser Reid. (2004). Insights into the Social and Psychological Effects of SMS Text Messaging. 57 indexed citations

8.

Ball, Linden J., et al.. (2001). The Exploration of Solution Options in Design: A ‘Naturalistic Decision Making’ Perspective.. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 12 indexed citations

9.

Reid, Fraser & Susan Reed. (2000). Cognitive Entrainment in Engineering Design Teams. Small Group Research. 31(3). 354–382. 15 indexed citations

10.

Reid, Fraser, et al.. (2000). A study of electronics engineering design teams. Design Studies. 21(4). 375–402. 25 indexed citations

11.

Ley, Ann, et al.. (2000). What do General Practitioners Discuss with their Patients?. Journal of Health Psychology. 5(1). 87–97. 7 indexed citations

12.

Reid, Fraser, Susan Reed, & Judy Edworthy. (1999). Design Visualization and Collaborative Interaction in Undergraduate Engineering Teams. 3(3). 235–259. 5 indexed citations

13.

Reid, Fraser, et al.. (1998). The Influence of Attitudes Toward Male and Female Patients on Treatment Decisions in General Practice. Sex Roles. 38(7-8). 613–629. 10 indexed citations

14.

Reid, Fraser, et al.. (1996). The messaging threshold in computer-mediated communication. Ergonomics. 39(8). 1017–1037. 51 indexed citations

15.

Reid, Fraser, et al.. (1995). Decisional conflict in general practice: Strategies of patient management. Social Science & Medicine. 41(3). 347–353. 20 indexed citations

16.

Donaldson, Morag L., et al.. (1987). Skills development in undergraduate psychology courses. 40. 469–472. 7 indexed citations

17.

Reid, Fraser. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self‐Categorization Theory. British Journal of Social Psychology. 26(4). 347–348. 5769 indexed citations breakdown →

18.

Reid, Fraser, et al.. (1984). Attitudinal politics in intergroup behaviour: Interpersonal vs. intergroup determinants of attitude change. British Journal of Social Psychology. 23(4). 335–340. 3 indexed citations

19.

Reid, Fraser. (1983). Polarizing effects of intergroup comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology. 13(1). 105–106. 9 indexed citations

20.

Wright, Patricia & Fraser Reid. (1973). Written information: Some alternatives to prose for expressing the outcomes of complex contingencies.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 57(2). 160–166. 90 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact