Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust
2010508 citationsArdion Beldad, Menno D.T. de Jong et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by M.F. Steehouder
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of M.F. Steehouder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.F. Steehouder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.F. Steehouder more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.F. Steehouder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.F. Steehouder. The network helps show where M.F. Steehouder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.F. Steehouder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.F. Steehouder.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.F. Steehouder based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M.F. Steehouder. M.F. Steehouder is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Karreman, Joyce, et al.. (2013). Confidence-increasing elements in user instructions: Seniors' reactions to verification steps and personal stories. Technical Communication. 60(3). 190–204.3 indexed citations
3.
Beldad, Ardion & M.F. Steehouder. (2012). Not That Button but the Other: Misunderstanding and Non-understanding in Helpdesk Encounters Involving Nonnative English Speakers. Technical Communication. 59(3). 179–194.4 indexed citations
Velsen, Lex van, Thea van der Geest, & M.F. Steehouder. (2010). The contribution of technical communicators to the user-centered design process of personalized systems. Technical Communication. 57(2). 182–196.4 indexed citations
6.
Meij, Hans van der, Joyce Karreman, & M.F. Steehouder. (2009). Three Decades of Research and Professional Practice on Printed Software Tutorials for Novices. Technical Communication. 56(3). 265–292.30 indexed citations
Steehouder, M.F., et al.. (2008). Horen, zien en verkrijgen? : een onderzoek naar het functioneren van Kijkwijzer en PEGI (Pan European Game Information) ter bescherming van jongeren tegen schadelijke mediabeelden. University of Twente Research Information.2 indexed citations
Verhoeven, Fenne, M.G.R. Hendrix, Alexander W. Friedrich, et al.. (2007). A web-based infectious disease communication system to enhance healthcare workers’ knowledge, attitude, and risk perception about safe work practices. Technology and Health Care. 15(5). 366–367.2 indexed citations
12.
Karreman, Joyce, et al.. (2007). Adding Motivational Elements to an Instruction Manual for Seniors: Effects on Usability and Motivation. Technical Communication. 54(3). 343–358.22 indexed citations
13.
Karreman, Joyce, et al.. (2006). Motivational elements in user instructions: strategies to boost the effectiveness of task performance. University of Twente Research Information.1 indexed citations
14.
Jong, Menno D.T. de, et al.. (2004). Cultural differences and usability evaluation. Individualistic and collectivistic participants compared.. Technical Communication. 51(4). 489–503.29 indexed citations
Steehouder, M.F. & Joyce Karreman. (2000). De verwerking van stapsgewijze instructies. University of Twente Research Information. 22(3). 218–237.2 indexed citations
18.
Steehouder, M.F., et al.. (2000). Role Playing on the Web: Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Personas Online. Technical Communication. 47(3). 327–340.31 indexed citations
19.
Steehouder, M.F.. (1997). Een blik op de vooruitblik. Waarin variaties op een saaie formulering de revue passeren. University of Twente Research Information. 3(4). 18–21.1 indexed citations
20.
Steehouder, M.F.. (1994). (Boekbespreking van:) L.Lentz & H. Pander Maat. Wat mankeert er aan die tekst? De evaluatie van voorlichtingsteksten over subsidieregelingen. 16(3). 254–256.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.