Nina Kaiser

1.5k citations
31 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Nina Kaiser

31 papers receiving 975 citations

Peers

Nina Kaiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 622
  • Clinical Psychology 570
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 258
  • Applied Psychology 80
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 225
Replace Charles A. Dill with:
Charles A. Dill United States
Angela W. Chiu United States
Maria Rogers Canada
Robert D. Lyman United States
Ortal Slobodin Israel
Miguel T. Villodas United States
Ashvind N. Singh United States
Martin T. Hoffman United States
Angela D. Adkins United States
Virginia H. Mackintosh United States
Nina Kaiser relative to Charles A. Dill United States Charles A. Dill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Charles A. Dill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Kaiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Kaiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Kaiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Kaiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Kaiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Kaiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Kaiser. The network helps show where Nina Kaiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Kaiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Kaiser Line = papers co-authored together Nina Kaiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20237
2 20231
3 20233
4 20221
5 20228
6 202122
7 202110
8 202031
9 201912
10 201942
11 20198
12 201480
13 201327
14 201366
15 201241
16 200816
17 20083
18 20077
19
[Does modification of documentation result in a reduction of medication to involuntary patients?].
20001
20
[Behavior of factor 13 following operations. I].
19695

About Nina Kaiser

Nina Kaiser is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (15 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (14 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (6 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Children's Physical and Motor Development (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (622 citations), Clinical Psychology (570 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (258 citations), Applied Psychology (80 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (225 citations). Nina Kaiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Betsy Hoza, Julie Sarno Owens, Linda J. Pfiffner, Keith McBurnett, Miguel T. Villodas, Patricia Cavazos‐Rehg, Mary Rooney, Erin Kasson, Christine A. Zalecki and Stephen P. Hinshaw. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Attention Disorders, Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, Internet Interventions, Journal of Adolescence and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026