Nina Auerbach
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Karl KroeberJoseph A. KestnerSven RothemundTorsten SchönebergKelly R. MonkMaxi CösterSarah C. PetersenInes Liebscher
- Topics
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (5 papers)Literature: history, themes, analysis (5 papers)Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyDenmark
In The Last Decade
Nina Auerbach
36 papers receiving 486 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Literature and Literary Theory 312
- Molecular Biology 179
- Sociology and Political Science 138
- Cultural Studies 128
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 109
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Auerbach
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Auerbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Auerbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Auerbach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Auerbach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Auerbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Auerbach. The network helps show where Nina Auerbach may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Auerbach
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Auerbach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Auerbach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Auerbach. Nina Auerbach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 207 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | Dracula : authoritative text, contexts, reviews and reactions, dramatic and film variations, criticism | 9 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Sisterhood is fractious | 0 |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 77 | |
| 15 | Communities of Women | 10 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Nina Auerbach
Nina Auerbach is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 810 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (5 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (5 papers) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (312 citations), Cultural Studies (128 citations) and Music (32 citations). Nina Auerbach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Karl Kroeber, Joseph A. Kestner, Sven Rothemund, Torsten Schöneberg, Kelly R. Monk, Maxi Cöster, Sarah C. Petersen, Ines Liebscher, Amit Mogha and Kerry Powell. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Cell Reports and Feminist Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.