Steve Neale

17 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Steve Neale
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Music 47
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 71
  • Literature and Literary Theory 152
  • Gender Studies 106
  • Economics and Econometrics 183
Replace Steven Shaviro with:
Steven Shaviro United States
Philip Rosen United States
Celia Britton United Kingdom
Noël Carroll United States
Gerald Mast United States
Thomas Y. Levin United States
Anna Everett United States
Robert A. Rosenstone United States
Tom Gunning United States
D. N. Rodowick United Kingdom
Steve Neale relative to Steven Shaviro United States Steven Shaviro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Steven Shaviro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Neale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Neale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Neale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Neale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Neale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Neale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Neale. The network helps show where Steve Neale may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Steve Neale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Neale Line = papers co-authored together Steve Neale links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1983128
2 2005123
3 199093
4 200655
5 198639
6 202123
7 202014
8
Status of near-shore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef 2004
200713
9
Epics, Spectacles, and Blockbusters: A Hollywood History
20109
10
Surveys of sessile benthic communities using the video technique. Long term monitoring of the Great Barrier Reef. Standard operational procedure No. 2
19968
11 20165
12 19864
13 20054
14 19854
15 20034
16
Epics, Spectacles, and Blockbusters
20103
17 19821
18
Film, Cinema, Genre: The Steve Neale Reader
20211
19 20121

About Steve Neale

Steve Neale is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Ecology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (9 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Marine and fisheries research (2 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (1 paper), South Asian Cinema and Culture (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (47 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (71 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (152 citations), Gender Studies (106 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (183 citations). Steve Neale has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Srinjoy Mitra, Nosrat Mirzai, John R. Mercer, Daniel Hoare, Johnston Davidson, Hugh Sweatman, Angus Thompson, Shuailong Zhang, Andrew Higson and Hadi Heidari. Their work appears in journals such as Screen, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, Historical Journal Of Film Radio and Television, Advanced Science and Oxford Literary Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact