Joseph Donohue
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Music top 10%
- Museology top 10%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jim DavisDavid MayerKerry PowellStuart CurranJames H. EllisSusan CarlsonJudith MilhousÓscar Wilde
- Topics
- Theatre and Performance Studies (6 papers)Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers)Irish and British Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Joseph Donohue
14 papers receiving 29 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Literature and Literary Theory 46
- Sociology and Political Science 28
- Music 19
- Museology 13
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 12
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Donohue
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Donohue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Donohue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Donohue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Donohue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Donohue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Donohue. The network helps show where Joseph Donohue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Donohue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Donohue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Donohue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Donohue. Joseph Donohue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Complete Works of Oscar Wilde: Volume V: Plays I: The Duchess of Padua, Salome: Drame en un Acte, Salome: Tragedy in One Act | 0 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Staircases and their theatrical impact | 2 |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | Oscar Wilde's The importance of being earnest | 0 |
| 9 | Oscar Wilde's The importance of being earnest : a reconstructive critical edition of the text of the first production, St. James's Theatre, London, 1895 | 3 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | The Theatrical manager in England and America : player of a perilous game, Philip Henslowe, Tate Wilkinson, Stephen Price, Edwin Booth, Charles Wyndham | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Joseph Donohue
Joseph Donohue is a scholar working on Music, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 25 papers that have together received 85 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (6 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers) and Irish and British Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (19 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (46 citations) and Museology (13 citations). Joseph Donohue has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jim Davis, David Mayer, Kerry Powell, Stuart Curran, James H. Ellis, Susan Carlson, Judith Milhous, Óscar Wilde, Peter Raby and Michael R. Booth. Their work appears in journals such as Theatre Journal, ELH and Studies in English Literature 1500-1900.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.