Feminist Review

1.9k papers and 62.1k indexed citations

About

The 1.9k papers published in Feminist Review in the last decades have received a total of 62.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Feminist Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (694 papers), Gender Studies (381 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (206 papers) specifically the topics of Gender, Feminism, and Media (134 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (111 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Feminist Review are Mary McIntosh, Judith Butler, Chandra Talpade Mohanty, Maureen McNeil, Donna Haraway, Jennifer C. Nash, Nira Yuval‐Davis, Chris Weedon, Nancy Fraser and Ángela McRobbie.

In The Last Decade

Feminist Review

1.1k papers receiving 22.2k citations

Countries where authors publish in Feminist Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Feminist Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Feminist Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feminist Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Feminist Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Feminist Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Feminist Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026