Bram Stoker

401 total citations
18 papers, 47 citations indexed

About

Bram Stoker is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Bram Stoker has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 47 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 14 papers in Cultural Studies and 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Bram Stoker's work include Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (14 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (13 papers) and Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (4 papers). Bram Stoker is often cited by papers focused on Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (14 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (13 papers) and Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (4 papers). Bram Stoker collaborates with scholars based in . Bram Stoker's co-authors include Nina Auerbach, John Paul Riquelme, Robert Louis Stevenson, Mary Shelley, William Martin, Edgar Allan Poë and Washington Irving and has published in prestigious journals such as Cambridge University Press eBooks, Oxford University Press eBooks and Penguin Books.

In The Last Decade

Bram Stoker

10 papers receiving 30 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bram Stoker 5 28 23 8 6 5 18 47
Victor Sage United Kingdom 4 26 0.9× 33 1.4× 3 0.4× 8 1.3× 13 2.6× 11 51
Inge Stephan Germany 4 8 0.3× 25 1.1× 2 0.3× 7 1.2× 10 2.0× 41 55
John Worthen United Kingdom 4 6 0.2× 21 0.9× 3 0.4× 6 1.0× 3 0.6× 22 34
Gwen Kirkpatrick United States 4 13 0.5× 22 1.0× 1 0.1× 4 0.7× 7 1.4× 14 36
Richard Bowring United Kingdom 5 46 1.6× 6 0.3× 4 0.5× 4 0.7× 26 5.2× 31 71
Thomas Schaub United States 4 16 0.6× 68 3.0× 2 0.3× 12 2.0× 2 0.4× 12 73
Paul Gordon Schalow Netherlands 5 40 1.4× 7 0.3× 2 0.3× 3 0.5× 22 4.4× 15 57
Antonio Viego United States 3 16 0.6× 5 0.2× 3 0.4× 2 0.3× 19 3.8× 9 37
Steven Frye United States 3 21 0.8× 37 1.6× 10 1.7× 3 0.6× 15 42
Andrew M. Stauffer United States 4 3 0.1× 34 1.5× 3 0.4× 14 2.3× 10 2.0× 29 53

Countries citing papers authored by Bram Stoker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bram Stoker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bram Stoker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bram Stoker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bram Stoker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bram Stoker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bram Stoker. The network helps show where Bram Stoker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bram Stoker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bram Stoker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bram Stoker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bram Stoker. Bram Stoker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Shelley, Mary, Bram Stoker, & Robert Louis Stevenson. (2019). Frankenstein, Dracula, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
2.
Stoker, Bram. (2017). Dracula (Oxford World's Classics). 1 indexed citations
3.
Stoker, Bram. (2013). Dracula. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations
4.
Stoker, Bram. (2013). Personal Reminiscences of Henry Irving. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 6 indexed citations
5.
Stoker, Bram. (2013). Personal Reminiscences of Henry Irving. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 7 indexed citations
6.
Stoker, Bram. (2011). Dracula. Oxford University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations
7.
Stoker, Bram, et al.. (2010). Dracula: The Graphic Novel. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
8.
Stoker, Bram, et al.. (2008). Bram Stoker's notes for Dracula. 3 indexed citations
9.
Stoker, Bram, et al.. (2008). The New Annotated Dracula. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 7 indexed citations
10.
Stoker, Bram. (2007). Dracula: by Bram Stoker. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 1 indexed citations
11.
Stoker, Bram, et al.. (2006). Dracula's guest and other weird stories : with The lair of the white worm. Penguin Books.
12.
Stoker, Bram. (2005). Dracula. Amsterdam University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
13.
Martin, William, Bram Stoker, & John Paul Riquelme. (2004). Dracula (Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism). Modern Language Studies. 34(1/2). 104–104.
14.
Irving, Washington, et al.. (2000). Cuentos de terror.
15.
Stoker, Bram, et al.. (1997). Dracula : authoritative text, contexts, reviews and reactions, dramatic and film variations, criticism. W.W. Norton eBooks. 9 indexed citations
16.
Stoker, Bram, et al.. (1992). Self-Help Transfusion. 218–218. 1 indexed citations
17.
Stoker, Bram, et al.. (1992). Bram Stoker's Dracula Omnibus. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations
18.
Stoker, Bram, et al.. (1975). The annotated Dracula : Dracula. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026