Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco
2015793 citationsLisa Rayle, Danielle Dai et al.Transport Policyprofile →
Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Facilitate the First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections
2016341 citationsSusan Shaheen, Nelson Chanprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Nelson Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nelson Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nelson Chan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nelson Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nelson Chan. The network helps show where Nelson Chan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nelson Chan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nelson Chan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nelson Chan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nelson Chan. Nelson Chan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shaheen, Susan, Nelson Chan, & Lisa Rayle. (2017). Ridesourcing’s Impact and Role in Urban Transportation. eScholarship (California Digital Library).10 indexed citations
Chan, Nelson, et al.. (2015). Approach to caring for developmentally disabled adults in the community: medical, ethical, and legal considerations.. PubMed. 61(1). 27–31.2 indexed citations
4.
Shaheen, Susan & Nelson Chan. (2015). MOBILITY AND THE SHARING ECONOMY : IMPACTS SYNOPSIS.21 indexed citations
5.
Rayle, Lisa, Danielle Dai, Nelson Chan, Robert Cervero, & Susan Shaheen. (2015). Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy. 45. 168–178.793 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Rayle, Lisa, Susan Shaheen, & Nelson Chan. (2014). App-Based, On-Demand Ride Services: Comparing Taxi and Ridesourcing Trips and User Characteristics in San Francisco. Transportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.121 indexed citations
7.
Martin, Elliot, et al.. (2013). Dynamic Ecodriving in Northern California: Study of Survey and Vehicle Operations Data from Ecodriving Feedback Device. Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.8 indexed citations
8.
Chan, Nelson & Susan Shaheen. (2011). Ridesharing in North America: Past, Present, and Future. eScholarship (California Digital Library).3 indexed citations
Simons, Robert A., et al.. (1998). Government Regulation of Contaminated Land: A Tale of Three Cities. EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University). 15(5). 321–337.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.