Countries where authors publish in Built Environment
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Built Environment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Built Environment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Built Environment more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Built Environment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Built Environment.
About Built Environment
The 771 papers published in Built Environment in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Built Environment usually cover Urban Studies (214 papers), Transportation (137 papers), Building and Construction (84 papers), Finance (54 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (89 papers) specifically the topics of Urban Transport and Accessibility (97 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (68 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (64 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (51 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (46 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (45 papers), Urban Design and Spatial Analysis (40 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Built Environment are Stephan Pauleit, J. F. Handley, A. Roland Ennos, Peter Hall, Ben Hamilton-Baillie, Susan Handy, Susan Shaheen, Robert L. Wilby, Nelson Chan and Frans M. Dieleman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.