Natalia Padilla-Zea

1.0k total citations
53 papers, 450 citations indexed

About

Natalia Padilla-Zea is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalia Padilla-Zea has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 450 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 22 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 17 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Natalia Padilla-Zea's work include Educational Games and Gamification (29 papers), Digital Games and Media (14 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers). Natalia Padilla-Zea is often cited by papers focused on Educational Games and Gamification (29 papers), Digital Games and Media (14 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers). Natalia Padilla-Zea collaborates with scholars based in Spain, France and Colombia. Natalia Padilla-Zea's co-authors include Francisco Luís Gutiérrez Vela, Patricia Paderewski, Francisco Montero, José Luís González Sanchez, Daniel Burgos, Nuria Medina-Medina, César A. Collazos, Ahmed Tlili, Carina Soledad González González and Kinshuk Kinshuk and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers in Human Behavior and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Natalia Padilla-Zea

44 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalia Padilla-Zea Spain 10 237 145 102 86 81 53 450
Carolina Islas Sedano Finland 10 245 1.0× 138 1.0× 79 0.8× 69 0.8× 118 1.5× 27 524
Sheng-Chin Yu Taiwan 2 348 1.5× 157 1.1× 94 0.9× 110 1.3× 54 0.7× 5 499
Jennifer S. Thom Canada 11 226 1.0× 123 0.8× 81 0.8× 72 0.8× 44 0.5× 41 536
Elena Patricia Núñez Castellar Belgium 7 307 1.3× 104 0.7× 55 0.5× 87 1.0× 88 1.1× 15 450
Dennis Charsky United States 4 297 1.3× 113 0.8× 45 0.4× 82 1.0× 80 1.0× 7 440
Élise Lavoué France 13 422 1.8× 163 1.1× 106 1.0× 209 2.4× 80 1.0× 31 612
Patricia Paderewski Spain 10 162 0.7× 117 0.8× 65 0.6× 74 0.9× 83 1.0× 72 389
José Luís González Sanchez Spain 10 206 0.9× 112 0.8× 74 0.7× 62 0.7× 41 0.5× 21 357
Mary Jo Dondlinger United States 8 368 1.6× 136 0.9× 50 0.5× 129 1.5× 69 0.9× 21 512
Fong-Ling Fu Taiwan 5 397 1.7× 180 1.2× 99 1.0× 138 1.6× 76 0.9× 9 598

Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Padilla-Zea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Padilla-Zea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Padilla-Zea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Padilla-Zea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Padilla-Zea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Padilla-Zea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Padilla-Zea. The network helps show where Natalia Padilla-Zea may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalia Padilla-Zea

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalia Padilla-Zea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalia Padilla-Zea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalia Padilla-Zea. Natalia Padilla-Zea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Padilla-Zea, Natalia, et al.. (2025). Modeling the physiological response of flow in groups: a mathematical approach. Smart Learning Environments. 12(1).
2.
Padilla-Zea, Natalia, et al.. (2023). Validated Questionnaires in Flow Theory: A Systematic Review. Electronics. 12(13). 2769–2769. 9 indexed citations
3.
Tlili, Ahmed, et al.. (2022). Game-Based Learning for Learners With Disabilities—What Is Next? A Systematic Literature Review From the Activity Theory Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 814691–814691. 12 indexed citations
4.
Nascimbeni, Fabio, António Teixeira, Alicia García‐Holgado, et al.. (2020). The Opengame Competencies Framework: an Attempt to Map Open Education Attitudes, Knowledge and Skills. 105–112. 1 indexed citations
5.
Padilla-Zea, Natalia, et al.. (2020). Training on Social Economy Entrepreneurship. Journal of Information Technology Research. 13(3). 156–173. 1 indexed citations
6.
Vela, Francisco Luís Gutiérrez, et al.. (2018). Introduciendo una historia interactiva en una experiencia geolocalizada. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 19(1). 69–85. 1 indexed citations
7.
Medina-Medina, Nuria, et al.. (2018). Modelo para la integración de procesos educativos en una aventura gráfica. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva (Universidad de Huelva). 7(1). 33–50. 1 indexed citations
8.
Ortega, Félix Zurita, et al.. (2017). El trabajo del estudiante y el uso de plataforma de apoyo a la docencia, como opciones metodológicas en la universidad. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 9(25). 1129–1154. 1 indexed citations
9.
Padilla-Zea, Natalia, et al.. (2017). Social seducement: towards the foundations for a pedagogical model. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 13(21). 45–52. 2 indexed citations
10.
Padilla-Zea, Natalia, et al.. (2015). Evaluación continua para aprendizaje basado en competencias: Una propuesta para videojuegos educativos. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 21(21). 3. 2 indexed citations
11.
Padilla-Zea, Natalia, et al.. (2015). A design process for balanced educational video games with collaborative activities. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
12.
Vela, Francisco Luís Gutiérrez, et al.. (2015). Teaching Emotions to Children by Using Video Games. 1–3. 1 indexed citations
13.
Padilla-Zea, Natalia, et al.. (2015). A design process for balanced educational video games with collaborative activities. DYNA. 82(193). 223–232. 5 indexed citations
14.
Vela, Francisco Luís Gutiérrez, et al.. (2014). Continuous Assessment in Educational Video Games. 1–8. 5 indexed citations
15.
Vela, Francisco Luís Gutiérrez, et al.. (2012). Educational Playability Analyzing Player Experiences in Educational Video Games. Advances in Computer-Human Interaction. 326–335. 10 indexed citations
16.
Vela, Francisco Luís Gutiérrez, et al.. (2012). Educational Video Game Design Based on Educational Playability: A Comprehensive and Integrated Literature Review. 5. 400–414. 7 indexed citations
17.
Vela, Francisco Luís Gutiérrez, et al.. (2012). Playability: analysing user experience in video games. Behaviour and Information Technology. 31(10). 1033–1054. 114 indexed citations
18.
Padilla-Zea, Natalia, et al.. (2009). Diseño de Videojuegos Colaborativos y Educativos Centrado en la Jugabilidad.. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje. 4. 191–198.
19.
Collazos, César A., et al.. (2009). Análisis y monitorización de la interacción en entornos colaborativos mediante el uso de SNA. 37–43. 3 indexed citations
20.
Padilla-Zea, Natalia, et al.. (2008). Diseño de videojuegos colaborativos y educativos centrados en la jugabilidad. 459–464. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026