Natalia Jiménez

852 citations
23 papers · 548 indexed · h-index 11

Natalia Jiménez

21 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

Natalia Jiménez
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • General Decision Sciences 83
  • Safety Research 352
  • Demography 140
  • Sociology and Political Science 221
  • Management Science and Operations Research 62
Replace Franziska Föllmi-Heusi with:
Franziska Föllmi-Heusi Germany
Tom Lane China
Bjørn‐Atle Reme Norway
Alex Rees-Jones United States
Gregory J. Dardis United States
Alessandra L. González United States
Jing Qian China
Kenneth E. Sumner United States
Joe J. Gladstone United States
Namika Sagara United States
Natalia Jiménez relative to Franziska Föllmi-Heusi Germany Franziska Föllmi-Heusi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Franziska Föllmi-Heusi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Jiménez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Jiménez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Jiménez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Jiménez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Jiménez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Jiménez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Jiménez. The network helps show where Natalia Jiménez may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Natalia Jiménez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalia Jiménez Line = papers co-authored together Natalia Jiménez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20242
3 20241
4 20231
5 201813
6
Eliciting real-life social networks: a guided tour
20171
7 20174
8 201715
9 20171
10 201469
11 20142
12 201416
13 201288
14 201151
15 20110
16
Eliciting Social Networks: An Experimental Approach
20091
17 200884
18 200873
19 200713
20
Gender based prescriptions: evidence for altruism
20063

About Natalia Jiménez

Natalia Jiménez is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Decision Sciences and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 23 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (13 papers), Game Theory and Applications (7 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (5 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (2 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (83 citations), Safety Research (352 citations) and Demography (140 citations). Natalia Jiménez has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ramón Cobo‐Reyes, Gary Charness, Pablo Brañas‐Garza, Francisco Lagos, Juan Antonio Lacomba, Ninfa C. Peña-Purcell, May Boggess, Giovanni Ponti, Marı́a Paz Espinosa and Jaromír Kovářík. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications and European Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026