Naomi White

48 total papers · 893 total citations
21 papers, 537 citations indexed

About

Naomi White is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Naomi White has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 537 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 7 papers in Clinical Psychology and 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Naomi White's work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers). Naomi White is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers). Naomi White collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Naomi White's co-authors include Claire Hughes, Rory T. Devine, Rosie Ensor, Fiona Jack, Elaine Reese, Gabrielle McHarg, David Goldberg, Rumina Taylor, A. Mann and Liana Machado and has published in prestigious journals such as Developmental Psychology, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Psychological Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Naomi White

19 papers receiving 519 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Naomi White	183	165	137	123	100	21	537
Jacqueline J. Hill	135 0.7×	149 0.9×	102 0.7×	284 2.3×	41 0.4×	13	563
Rebecca D. Stinson	209 1.1×	74 0.4×	109 0.8×	78 0.6×	97 1.0×	12	531
Deborah Hill	212 1.2×	125 0.8×	77 0.6×	222 1.8×	81 0.8×	20	503
Ronit Roth‐Hanania	293 1.6×	178 1.1×	284 2.1×	129 1.0×	45 0.5×	13	547
Diana E. Gal‐Szabo	218 1.2×	83 0.5×	96 0.7×	173 1.4×	47 0.5×	27	501
Alyssa Sawyer	299 1.6×	80 0.5×	95 0.7×	91 0.7×	79 0.8×	36	616
Ingrid Klackenberg‐Larsson	266 1.5×	54 0.3×	93 0.7×	49 0.4×	123 1.2×	17	537
Lizet Ketelaar	177 1.0×	344 2.1×	105 0.8×	274 2.2×	71 0.7×	16	601
Michael Espinosa	231 1.3×	63 0.4×	78 0.6×	50 0.4×	90 0.9×	17	555
Mita Banerjee	180 1.0×	263 1.6×	190 1.4×	117 1.0×	82 0.8×	35	559

Countries citing papers authored by Naomi White

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi White

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi White. The network helps show where Naomi White may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi White

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi White. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi White based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi White. Naomi White is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact