Fiona Jack

964 total citations
21 papers, 435 citations indexed

About

Fiona Jack is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Fiona Jack has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 435 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Fiona Jack's work include Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (8 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers). Fiona Jack is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (8 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers). Fiona Jack collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Fiona Jack's co-authors include Harlene Hayne, Rachel Zajac, Elaine Reese, Naomi White, Qi Wang, Helena M. McAnally, Yan Chen, Tia Neha, Gabrielle Simcock and William J. Friedman and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, The Journals of Gerontology Series B and Journal of Adolescence.

In The Last Decade

Fiona Jack

20 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Fiona Jack New Zealand	12	269	232	124	123	81	21	435
Marina Larkina United States	14	335 1.2×	303 1.3×	96 0.8×	54 0.4×	49 0.6×	24	560
Sarah Kulkofsky United States	12	345 1.3×	311 1.3×	130 1.0×	147 1.2×	107 1.3×	19	574
Melissa K. Welch-Ross United States	10	375 1.4×	199 0.9×	90 0.7×	121 1.0×	78 1.0×	17	530
Cynthia E. Gangi United States	9	111 0.4×	152 0.7×	111 0.9×	108 0.9×	53 0.7×	14	389
Christin Köber Germany	11	344 1.3×	80 0.3×	198 1.6×	93 0.8×	133 1.6×	17	491
Jonathan S. Beier United States	10	180 0.7×	189 0.8×	62 0.5×	167 1.4×	54 0.7×	15	387
Kelly A. Marin United States	9	266 1.0×	62 0.3×	176 1.4×	126 1.0×	151 1.9×	11	423
Mary K. Mullen United States	4	282 1.0×	167 0.7×	75 0.6×	85 0.7×	53 0.7×	5	379
Iori Tani Japan	9	95 0.4×	142 0.6×	53 0.4×	82 0.7×	143 1.8×	19	391
Kathie Halbach Moffitt United States	5	266 1.0×	151 0.7×	112 0.9×	69 0.6×	74 0.9×	8	351

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Jack

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Jack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Jack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Jack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Jack

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Jack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Jack. The network helps show where Fiona Jack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fiona Jack

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fiona Jack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fiona Jack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fiona Jack. Fiona Jack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ruffman, Ted, et al.. (2019). Empathic Accuracy: Worse Recognition by Older Adults and Less Transparency in Older Adult Expressions Compared With Young Adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 75(8). 1658–1667. 6 indexed citations

Jack, Fiona. (2018). Issues of Representation. 5.

Reese, Elaine, Helena M. McAnally, Yan Chen, et al.. (2016). Telling the Tale and Living Well: Adolescent Narrative Identity, Personality Traits, and Well-Being Across Cultures. Child Development. 88(2). 612–628. 68 indexed citations

Jack, Fiona, et al.. (2016). Preparing children for cross-examination: do the practice questions matter?. Psychology Crime and Law. 22(9). 858–878. 1 indexed citations

Jack, Fiona, William J. Friedman, Elaine Reese, & Rachel Zajac. (2016). Age-related differences in memory for time, temporal reconstruction, and the availability and use of temporal landmarks. Cognitive Development. 37. 53–66. 16 indexed citations

Zajac, Rachel, et al.. (2016). The Diagnostic Value of Children's Responses to Cross‐Examination Questioning. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 34(1). 160–177. 5 indexed citations

Jack, Fiona, et al.. (2015). Getting the Picture: Effects of Sketch Plans and Photographs on Children's, Adolescents' and Adults' Eyewitness Recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 29(5). 723–734. 11 indexed citations

Zajac, Rachel & Fiona Jack. (2015). Improving children's performance on photographic line‐ups: Do the physical properties of a ‘wildcard’ make a difference?. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 21(2). 358–371. 4 indexed citations

Reese, Elaine, Yan Chen, Helena M. McAnally, et al.. (2014). Narratives and traits in personality development among New Zealand Māori, Chinese, and European adolescents. Journal of Adolescence. 37(5). 727–737. 35 indexed citations

10.

Jack, Fiona, et al.. (2014). Young children's responses to cross-examination style questioning: the effects of delay and subsequent questioning. Psychology Crime and Law. 21(3). 274–296. 16 indexed citations

11.

Jack, Fiona, et al.. (2013). Are co-witnesses special? Comparing the influence of co-witness and interviewer misinformation on eyewitness reports. Memory. 22(3). 243–255. 9 indexed citations

12.

Jack, Fiona, et al.. (2013). Age‐related Differences in the Free‐recall Accounts of Child, Adolescent, and Adult Witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 28(1). 30–38. 55 indexed citations

13.

Gross, Julien, et al.. (2012). Do children recall the birth of a younger sibling? Implications for the study of childhood amnesia. Memory. 21(3). 336–346. 8 indexed citations

14.

Jack, Fiona, Gabrielle Simcock, & Harlene Hayne. (2011). Magic Memories: Young Children’s Verbal Recall After a 6-Year Delay. Child Development. 83(1). 159–172. 15 indexed citations

15.

Hayne, Harlene & Fiona Jack. (2010). Childhood amnesia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science. 2(2). 136–145. 22 indexed citations

16.

Jack, Fiona, et al.. (2010). Improving childrens accuracy on target-absent lineups: Do the physical characteristics of the wildcard influence its success? -poster. 1(6110). 387–8. 1 indexed citations

17.

Reese, Elaine, Fiona Jack, & Naomi White. (2010). Origins of adolescents’ autobiographical memories. Cognitive Development. 25(4). 352–367. 68 indexed citations

18.

Jack, Fiona & Harlene Hayne. (2010). Childhood amnesia: Empirical evidence for a two-stage phenomenon. Memory. 18(8). 831–844. 35 indexed citations

19.

Jack, Fiona, Shelley MacDonald, Elaine Reese, & Harlene Hayne. (2009). Maternal Reminiscing Style During Early Childhood Predicts the Age of Adolescents’ Earliest Memories. Child Development. 80(2). 496–505. 1 indexed citations

20.

Jack, Fiona & Harlene Hayne. (2007). Eliciting adults’ earliest memories: Does it matter how we ask the question?. Memory. 15(6). 647–663. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact