Sally Ann Rhea
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael C. StallingsAlan C. AcockMegan M. McClellandAndrea M. PiccininRobin P. CorleyJohn K. HewittLee J. AltamiranoAkira Miyake
- Topics
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers)Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (3 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Clinical PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionDevelopmental Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Sally Ann Rhea
11 papers receiving 680 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Clinical Psychology 278
- Education 273
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 168
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 160
- Cognitive Neuroscience 104
Countries citing papers authored by Sally Ann Rhea
This map shows the geographic impact of Sally Ann Rhea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sally Ann Rhea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sally Ann Rhea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sally Ann Rhea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sally Ann Rhea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sally Ann Rhea. The network helps show where Sally Ann Rhea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sally Ann Rhea
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sally Ann Rhea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sally Ann Rhea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sally Ann Rhea. Sally Ann Rhea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 197 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | Relations between preschool attention span-persistence and age 25 educational outcomesbreakdown → | 341 |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 25 |
About Sally Ann Rhea
Sally Ann Rhea is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Demography and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 700 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (278 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (168 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (160 citations). Sally Ann Rhea has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Stallings, Alan C. Acock, Megan M. McClelland, Andrea M. Piccinin, Robin P. Corley, John K. Hewitt, Lee J. Altamirano, Akira Miyake, Susan E. Young and Naomi P. Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Developmental Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.